Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37835126›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

The Integration of Social Science for Community Engagement in the Humanitarian Fields of Conflicts and Disasters: A Scoping Review.

Luisa Toro-Alzate, Paola Maffi, Anu Puri, Rania Elessawi, Maria Falero Cusano, Jozefien Groenendijk, Daniel H de Vries

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luisa Toro-AlzateAmsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development (AIGHD), 1105 BP Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Paola MaffiAthena Institute, VU University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0008-0349-1163
Anu PuriUNICEF Europe and Central Asian, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Rania ElessawiUNICEF NY Headquarters, Social Behavior Change, New York, NY 10017, USA.
Maria Falero CusanoUNICEF NY Headquarters, Social Behavior Change, New York, NY 10017, USA.
Jozefien GroenendijkAthena Institute, VU University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Daniel H de VriesAmsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development (AIGHD), 1105 BP Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7455-0628

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community engagement (CE) is essential to humanitarian assistance, and the social sciences have been credited in recent epidemics and disease outbreaks as having played a crucial, supportive role. Broadening this attention to other humanitarian fields, this scoping review asks what lessons learned can be found in grey and peer-reviewed literature on the integration of the social sciences in CE for conflicts and disasters. Using an analytical framework developed through a UNICEF-led project called Social Science for Community Engagement (SS4CE) in Humanitarian Action, we identified 1093 peer reviewed publications and 315 grey literature reports of possible relevance. The results show that only a small minority-18 publications and 4 reports-tangibly comment on the relevance of social sciences, mostly only in passing and implicitly. While social science techniques are used and the importance of understanding a community's cultural, linguistic, and religious context is emphasized, further discussion on the integration of transdisciplinary and multidisciplinary social sciences is absent. Furthermore, CE is mostly seen as an instrumental ('means to an end') involvement, for example to collect data in emergency situations and receive feedback on interventions, but not as a critical and transformative intervention. We conclude that unlike the attention given to social sciences in disease outbreaks, there is a knowledge gap and an accordingly proper planning and implementation gap regarding the potentiality of social science to improve CE across all humanitarian contexts of disasters and conflicts.

Indexed as

DisastersEpidemicsRelief WorkAltruismDisease Outbreakscommunity engagementconflictdisastershazardshumanitarian actionsocial sciences

Identifiers

PMID37835126
PMCPMC10573063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.