Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37834956›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Comparison of Motor Evoked Potentials Neuromonitoring Following Pre- and Postoperative Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Intraoperative Electrical Stimulation in Patients Undergoing Surgical Correction of Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Przemysław Daroszewski, Juliusz Huber, Katarzyna Kaczmarek, Piotr Janusz, Paweł Główka, Marek Tomaszewski, Małgorzata Domagalska, Tomasz Kotwicki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Przemysław DaroszewskiDepartment of Organization and Management in Health Care, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 28 Czerwca 1956 r. Str., no. 135/147, 61-545 Poznań, Poland.
Juliusz HuberDepartment Pathophysiology of Locomotor Organs, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 28 Czerwca 1956 r. Str., no. 135/147, 61-545 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8671-0497
Katarzyna KaczmarekDepartment Pathophysiology of Locomotor Organs, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 28 Czerwca 1956 r. Str., no. 135/147, 61-545 Poznań, Poland.
Piotr JanuszDepartment of Spine Disorders and Pediatric Orthopaedics, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 28 Czerwca 1956 r. Str., no. 135/147, 61-545 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5702-4933
Paweł GłówkaDepartment of Spine Disorders and Pediatric Orthopaedics, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 28 Czerwca 1956 r. Str., no. 135/147, 61-545 Poznań, Poland.
Marek TomaszewskiDepartment of Spine Disorders and Pediatric Orthopaedics, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 28 Czerwca 1956 r. Str., no. 135/147, 61-545 Poznań, Poland.
Małgorzata DomagalskaDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Rusa 55, 61-245 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9067-0969
Tomasz KotwickiDepartment of Spine Disorders and Pediatric Orthopaedics, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 28 Czerwca 1956 r. Str., no. 135/147, 61-545 Poznań, Poland.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationships between the results of pre- and intraoperative motor evoked potential recordings during neuromonitoring and whether idiopathic scoliosis (IS) surgical correction improves the spinal efferent transmission have not been specified in detail. This study aims to compare the results of surface-recorded electromyography (EMG), electroneurography (ENG, M, and F-waves), and especially motor evoked potential (MEP) recordings from tibialis anterior muscle (TA) bilaterally in 353 girls with right idiopathic scoliosis (types 1-3 according to Lenke classification). It has not yet been documented whether the results of MEP recordings induced by transcranial single magnetic stimulus (TMS, pre- and postoperatively) and trains of electrical stimuli (TES; intraoperatively in T0-before surgery, T1-after pedicle screws implantation, and T2-after scoliosis curvature distraction and derotation following two-rod implantation) can be compared for diagnostic verification of the improvement of spinal cord neural transmission. We attempted to determine whether the constant level of optimal anesthesia during certain surgical steps of scoliosis treatment affects the parameters of MEPs recorded during neuromonitoring procedures. No neurological deficits have been observed postoperatively. The values of amplitudes but not latencies in MEP recordings evoked with TMS in IS patients compared before and after surgery indicated a slight improvement in efferent neural transmission. The results of all neurophysiological studies in IS patients were significantly asymmetrical and recorded worse on the concave side, suggesting greater neurological motor deficits at

Indexed as

electromyographyelectroneurographyintraoperative neuromonitoringmotor evoked potentialspre- and postoperative neurophysiological recordingsscoliosis surgery

Identifiers

PMID37834956
PMCPMC10573895
OpenAlexW4387258668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.