ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023
Conduction System Pacing versus Conventional Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Where Are We Heading?
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Critical pathways in cardiology · 2026Pooled it
- Resynchronisation efficacy of pacing strategies depends on the assessment metric: a computational study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Conduction system pacing as a rescue strategy for unsuccessful cardiac resynchronisation therapy implantation.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Conduction System Pacing Improved Cardiac Functions, Myocardial Work and Functional Capacity in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction and Right Bundle Branch Block.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Added Value of MAPSE to Assess LV Systolic Function in Conventional Cardiac Pacing.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction appearing in remote period of right ventricular septal pacing in patient with left ventricular septal bulge.BMJ case reports · 2025Article
- A Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Echocardiographic Outcomes of Physiological Versus Conventional Pacing.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing to Overcome Coronary Sinus Anatomy-Related Technical Problems Encountered during Implantation of Biventricular CRT-A Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Left bundle branch pacing set to outshine biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy?World journal of cardiology · 2024Article
- Conduction system pacing versus biventricular pacing in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and electrical dyssynchrony.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the last few years, pacing of the conduction system (CSP) has emerged as the new standard pacing modality for bradycardia indications, allowing a more physiological ventricular activation compared to conventional right ventricular pacing. CSP has also emerged as an alternative modality to conventional biventricular pacing for the delivery of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients. However, if the initial clinical data seem to support this new physiological-based approach to CRT, the lack of large randomized studies confirming these preliminary results prevents CSP from being used routinely in clinical practice. Furthermore, concerns are still present regarding the long-term performance of pacing leads when employed for CSP, as well as their extractability. In this review article, we provide the state-of-the-art of CSP as an alternative to biventricular pacing for CRT delivery in heart failure patients. In particular, we describe the physiological concepts supporting this approach and we discuss the future perspectives of CSP in this context according to the implant techniques (His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing) and the clinical data published so far.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.