Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37834838›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Cochlear Implant Stimulation Parameters Play a Key Role in Reducing Facial Nerve Stimulation.

Lutz Gärtner, Bradford C Backus, Nicolas Le Goff, Anika Morgenstern, Thomas Lenarz, Andreas Büchner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lutz GärtnerDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2280-9487
Bradford C BackusOticon Medical, 06220 Vallauris, France.ORCID 0009-0008-2708-3359
Nicolas Le GoffOticon Medical, 06220 Vallauris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9253-2754
Anika MorgensternDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9783-8210
Thomas LenarzDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9307-5989
Andreas BüchnerDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6788-3985
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A percentage (i.e., 5.6%) of Cochlear Implant (CI) users reportedly experience unwanted facial nerve stimulation (FNS). For some, the effort to control this problem results in changing stimulation parameters, thereby reducing their hearing performance. For others, the only viable solution is to deactivate the CI completely. A growing body of evidence in the form of case reports suggests that undesired FNS can be effectively addressed through re-implantation with an Oticon Medical (OM) Neuro-Zti implant. However, the root of this benefit is still unknown: is it due to surgical adjustments, such as varied array geometries and/or positioning, or does it stem from differences in stimulation parameters and/or grounding? The OM device exhibits two distinct features: (1) unique stimulation parameters, including anodic leading pulses and loudness controlled by pulse duration-not current-resulting in lower overall current amplitudes; and (2) unconventional grounding, including both passive (capacitive) discharge, which creates a pseudo-monophasic pulse shape, and a 'distributed-all-polar' (DAP) grounding scheme, which is thought to reduce current spread. Unfortunately, case reports alone cannot distinguish between surgical factors and these implant-related ones. In this paper, we present a novel follow-up study of two CI subjects who previously experienced FNS before re-implantation with Neuro-Zti implants. We used the Oticon Medical Research Platform (OMRP) to stimulate a single electrode in each subject in two ways: (1) with traditional monopolar biphasic cathodic-first pulses, and (2) with distinct OM clinical stimulation. We progressively increased the stimulation intensity until FNS occurred or the sound became excessively loud. Non-auditory/FNS sensations were observed with the traditional stimulation but not with the OM clinical one. This provides the first direct evidence demonstrating that stimulation parameters and/or grounding-not surgical factors-play a key role in mitigating FNS.

Indexed as

CIcochlear implantelectrodefacial nerveFNSOMRPOticon Medical Research Platformstimulation parameters

Identifiers

PMID37834838
PMCPMC10573649
OpenAlexW4387048436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.