Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37834797›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

No More Venous Ulcers-What More Can We Do?

Agata Stanek, Giovanni Mosti, Temirov Surat Nematillaevich, Eva Maria Valesky, Tanja Planinšek Ručigaj, Malika Boucelma, George Marakomichelakis, Aaron Liew, Bahar Fazeli, Mariella Catalano and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Planning self-care with patients with venous leg ulcers: a reflective lifeworld study of healthcare professionals.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Article
  2. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Venous Disease of the Lower Extremities: A Narrative Review.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Kick-Starting Wound Healing: A Review of Pro-Healing Drugs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 8 countries.

Agata StanekDepartment of Internal Medicine, Angiology and Physical Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Batorego 15 Street, 41-902 Bytom, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6939-9898
Giovanni MostiVAS-International Consortium-International No More Venous Ulcers Strategic Network, 20157 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7639-8463
Temirov Surat NematillaevichVAS-International Consortium-International No More Venous Ulcers Strategic Network, 20157 Milan, Italy.
Eva Maria ValeskyVAS-International Consortium-International No More Venous Ulcers Strategic Network, 20157 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0182-790X
Tanja Planinšek RučigajVAS-International Consortium-International No More Venous Ulcers Strategic Network, 20157 Milan, Italy.
Malika BoucelmaVAS-International Consortium-International No More Venous Ulcers Strategic Network, 20157 Milan, Italy.
George MarakomichelakisVascular Independent Research and Education, European Foundation, 20157 Milan, Italy.
Aaron LiewVascular Independent Research and Education, European Foundation, 20157 Milan, Italy.
Bahar FazeliVascular Independent Research and Education, European Foundation, 20157 Milan, Italy.
Mariella CatalanoVascular Independent Research and Education, European Foundation, 20157 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8355-0344
Malay PatelVascular Independent Research and Education, European Foundation, 20157 Milan, Italy.
Apex Heart Institute · INEvangelismos Hospital · GRGoethe University Frankfurt · DEIMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca · ITLjubljana University Medical Centre · SIMedical University of Silesia · PLPortiuncula Hospital · IEUniversity of Algiers Benyoucef Benkhedda · DZUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are the most severe complication caused by the progression of chronic venous insufficiency. They account for approximately 70-90% of all chronic leg ulcers (CLUs). A total of 1% of the Western population will suffer at some time in their lives from a VLU. Furthermore, most CLUs are VLUs, defined as chronic leg wounds that show no tendency to heal after three months of appropriate treatment or are still not fully healed at 12 months. The essential feature of VLUs is their recurrence. VLUs also significantly impact quality of life and could cause social isolation and depression. They also have a significant avoidable economic burden. It is estimated that the treatment of venous ulceration accounts for around 3% of the total expenditure on healthcare. A VLU-free world is a highly desirable aim but could be challenging to achieve with the current knowledge of the pathophysiology and diagnostic and therapeutical protocols. To decrease the incidence of VLUs, the long-term goal must be to identify high-risk patients at an early stage of chronic venous disease and initiate appropriate preventive measures. This review discusses the epidemiology, socioeconomic burden, pathophysiology, diagnosis, modes of conservative and invasive treatment, and prevention of VLUs.

Indexed as

burden of illnesscompression therapyconservative treatmentcostsinvasive treatmentpreventionrecurrent venous ulcervenous ulcer

Identifiers

PMID37834797
PMCPMC10573394
OpenAlexW4386995514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.