Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37834779›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Abdominal-Based Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: How to Inset the Flap to Maximize the Aesthetic Result-A Systematic Review.

Gianluca Sapino, Sherilyn K Tay, Michele Maruccia, Lloyd Nanhekhan, William Watfa, Gian Piero Mantovani, David Guillier, Pasquale Tedeschi, Russell Bramhall, Pietro Giovanni Di Summa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gianluca SapinoDepartment of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2716-8607
Sherilyn K TayCanniesburn Plastic Surgery Department, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G4 0SF, UK.
Michele MarucciaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2122-2732
Lloyd NanhekhanDepartment of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
William WatfaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Saint George University Hospital, Beirut 1100, Lebanon.
Gian Piero MantovaniDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital of Modena, 41121 Modena, Italy.
David GuillierDepartment of Plastic Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-University Hospital, 21000 Dijon, France.
Pasquale TedeschiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1353-2052
Russell BramhallCanniesburn Plastic Surgery Department, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G4 0SF, UK.
Pietro Giovanni Di SummaDepartment of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, the ultimate goal of microsurgical breast reconstruction is not merely the effective transfer of vascularized tissue but the achievement of a natural, symmetric appearance. The aim of this present study was to systematically summarize the published evidence on abdominal-based free flap inset for breast reconstruction in order to provide principles and classification that could guide the surgeon in choosing the most appropriate inset technique based on patient and flap characteristics. A comprehensive review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, looking for articles on the insetting technique for free flap breast reconstruction. After screening 306 publications, 24 papers (published from 1994 to 2020) were included in the study. We identified four main breast anatomical features on which the papers reviewed focused when describing their insetting technique: breast width, breast ptosis, breast projection, and upper pole fullness. Patient body type, type of mastectomy, and reported complications are also discussed. Flap shaping and inset during breast reconstruction are fundamental steps in any reconstructive procedure. Despite the low evidence in the current literature, this systematic review provides a framework to guide the surgeon's decision-making and optimize the aesthetic outcomes of abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction.

Indexed as

aesthetic reconstructionbreast reconstructiondiep flap

Identifiers

PMID37834779
PMCPMC10573810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.