Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37834699›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Evaluating the Biomechanical Integrity of Various Constructs Utilized for First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: A Systematic Review.

Abhinav R Balu, Anthony N Baumann, Terence Tsang, Grayson M Talaski, Albert T Anastasio, Kempland C Walley, Samuel B Adams

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis for severe hallux valgus deformity].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Abhinav R BaluFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60208, USA.
Anthony N BaumannCollege of Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH 44272, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4175-3135
Terence TsangCampbell University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lillington, NC 27546, USA.
Grayson M TalaskiDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0018-6410
Albert T AnastasioDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5817-3826
Kempland C WalleyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4488-0663
Samuel B AdamsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Duke University · USCampbell University · USNortheast Ohio Medical University · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint is a frequently loaded joint, handling loads up to 90% of bodyweight. First MTP arthrodesis is a frequently performed procedure designed to improve pain in patients with degenerative MTP joint disease. There are a wide variety of fixation constructs for this procedure without consensus on the most effective method. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical integrity of various constructs utilized for first MTP arthrodesis. A systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to 18 June 2023. Articles discussing the biomechanics of first MTP arthrodesis constructs were included. A total of 168 articles were retrieved. A total of 20 articles involving 446 cadaveric and synthetic bone constructs were included in the final review. Of the six articles comparing dorsal plating with compression screws to crossed interfragmentary screws, five found that dorsal plating had significantly higher stiffness. All three studies assessing shape-memory staples found them to be significantly less stable than crossed screws or dorsal plates alone. Both studies evaluating fully threaded screws found them to be stronger than crossed cancellous screws. Wedge resections have been shown to be 10 times stronger than standard planar or conical excision. Dorsal plating with compression screws is the gold standard for MTP arthrodesis. However, more research into newer methods such as fully threaded screws and wedge resections with an increased focus on translation to clinical outcomes is needed.

Indexed as

biomechanicsdorsal platehallux valgusinterfragmentary screwsMTP arthrodesis

Identifiers

PMID37834699
PMCPMC10573906
OpenAlexW4387376359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.