ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Flexural Strength Analysis of Different Complete Denture Resin-Based Materials Obtained by Conventional and Digital Manufacturing.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Physicomechanical properties of PMMA denture base resins reinforced with nanofibers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB · 2026Pooled it
- CAD-CAM vs. conventional denture bases: a systematic review with network meta-analysis ofFrontiers in dental medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of Flexural Strength and Flexural Modulus of Conventional and Graphene-Reinforced Polymethyl-Methacrylate under Thermocycled and Non-Thermocycled Conditions: An in-Vitro Study.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Mechanical Anisotropy and Fatigue Behavior of 3D-Printed Dentures: A Comparison with CAD/CAM Milled Bases After Thermomechanical Aging.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Mechanical, biological, optical, and clinical properties of 3d-printed denture base resins: a comprehensive narrative review.Odontology · 2026Review
- In Vitro Mechanical Evaluation of Prosthodontic Dental Acrylics Fabricated by Conventional and Additive Techniques.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effect of Print Orientation and Post-Curing Duration on the Flexural Strength, Flexural Modulus and Vickers Microhardness of a 3D-Printed Occlusal Splint Resin.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Shear Bond Strength Between Artificial Teeth and Denture Base Resins Fabricated by Conventional, Milled, and 3D-Printed Workflows: An In Vitro Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Recyclable Wind Turbine Blades: A Life Cycle Analysis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Systematic review and meta analysis of mechanical properties of 3D printed denture bases compared to milled and conventional materials.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Fracture Resistance of 3D-Printed Fixed Partial Dentures: Influence of Connector Size and Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of mechanical properties and color stability of 3D-printed denture base materials following two surface treatments.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Characterization of temporary and permanent 3D-printed crown and bridge resins.Biomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2025Article
- Article
- Mechanical and Material Analysis of 3D-Printed Temporary Materials for Implant Reconstructions-A Pilot Study.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- The Influence of Contemporary Denture Base Fabrication Methods on Residual Monomer Content, Flexural Strength and Microhardness.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Expediting the Rehabilitation of Severely Resorbed Ridges Using a Combination of CAD-CAM and Analog Techniques: A Case Report.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PMMA (Polymethylmethacrylate) is the material of choice to fabricate denture bases. Recently, with the introduction of CAD-CAM and 3D printers in dentistry, new materials have been proposed for complete denture manufacturing.
aimThis study compared the flexural strength of different resins fabricated using different technologies (conventional, CAD-CAM-milled, and 3D-printed) and polymerization techniques.
methodsA total of 11 different resins were tested: six PMMA conventional (Acrypol R, Acrypol LL, Acrypol HI, Acrypol Fast, Acryself and Acryslef P), two milled obtained from UDMA PMMA disks (Ivotion disk and Aadva disk, control groups), two 3D-printed PMMA resins (NextDent Denture 3D+, and SprintRayEU Denture Base), and one 3D-printed composite resin (GC Temp Print). Flexural strength was measured using a universal testing machine. One-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc tests were performed; the
resultsCAD-CAM-milled specimens showed the highest flexural strength (107.87 MPa for UDMA) followed by 3D-printed composite resins (102.96 MPa). Furthermore, 3D-printed resins polymerized for 40 min with the BB cure unit showed no statistically significant differences with conventional resin groups. Moreover, in all the 3D-printed specimens, a high correlation between polymerization technique and flexural strength was found.
conclusionsIn terms of flexural strength, the polymerization technique is a determinant for both acrylic and composite resins. Temp Print can be a potential alternative to fabricating removable dentures and showed promising results when used in combination with pink color resin powder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.