Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37834607›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Random Forest Classifier for Anomaly Detection in Laser-Powder Bed Fusion Using Optical Monitoring.

Imran Ali Khan, Hannes Birkhofer, Dominik Kunz, Drzewietzki Lukas, Vasily Ploshikhin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Imran Ali KhanAirbus Endowed Chair for Integrative Simulation and Engineering of Materials and Processes (ISEMP), University of Bremen, Am Fallturm 1, 28359 Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0009-5708-0551
Hannes BirkhoferAirbus Endowed Chair for Integrative Simulation and Engineering of Materials and Processes (ISEMP), University of Bremen, Am Fallturm 1, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
Dominik KunzElectro Optical Systems GmbH, Robert-Stirling Ring 1, 82152 Krailling, Germany.
Drzewietzki LukasLeibherr-Aerospace Lindenberg GmbH, Pfänderstraße 50-52, 881161 Lindenberg, Germany.
Vasily PloshikhinAirbus Endowed Chair for Integrative Simulation and Engineering of Materials and Processes (ISEMP), University of Bremen, Am Fallturm 1, 28359 Bremen, Germany.

Funding

German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy 20W1707E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metal additive manufacturing (AM) is a disruptive production technology, widely adopted in innovative industries that revolutionizes design and manufacturing. The interest in quality control of AM systems has grown substantially over the last decade, driven by AM's appeal for intricate, high-value, and low-volume production components. Geometry-dependent process conditions in AM yield unique challenges, especially regarding quality assurance. This study contributes to the development of machine learning models to enhance in-process monitoring and control technology, which is a critical step in cost reduction in metal AM. As the part is built layer upon layer, the features of each layer have an influence on the quality of the final part. Layer-wise in-process sensing can be used to retrieve condition-related features and help detect defects caused by improper process conditions. In this work, layer-wise monitoring using optical tomography (OT) imaging was employed as a data source, and a machine-learning (ML) technique was utilized to detect anomalies that can lead to defects. The major defects analyzed in this experiment were gas pores and lack of fusion defects. The Random Forest Classifier ML algorithm is employed to segment anomalies from optical images, which are then validated by correlating them with defects from computerized tomography (CT) data. Further, 3D mapping of defects from CT data onto the OT dataset is carried out using the affine transformation technique. The developed anomaly detection model's performance is evaluated using several metrics such as confusion matrix, dice coefficient, accuracy, precision, recall, and intersection-over-union (IOU). The k-fold cross-validation technique was utilized to ensure robustness and generalization of the model's performance. The best detection accuracy of the developed anomaly detection model is 99.98%. Around 79.40% of defects from CT data correlated with the anomalies detected from the OT data.

Indexed as

computerized tomographygas poreslack of fusionlaser powder bed fusionmachine learningoptical tomographyprocess monitoringquality inspectionrandom forest

Identifiers

PMID37834607
PMCPMC10573617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.