Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37834295›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

The Effect of Gene Editing by CRISPR-Cas9 of miR-21 and the Indirect Target MMP9 in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Juliana A Camargo, Nayara I Viana, Ruan Pimenta, Vanessa R Guimarães, Gabriel A Dos Santos, Patrícia Candido, Vitória Ghazarian, Poliana Romão, Iran A Silva, Alexander Birbrair and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Juliana A CamargoLaboratory of Medical Investigation (LIM 55), Urology Department, Medicine School, University of Sao Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo 01246-903, SP, Brazil.
Nayara I VianaLaboratory of Medical Investigation (LIM 55), Urology Department, Medicine School, University of Sao Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo 01246-903, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4505-8508
Ruan PimentaLaboratory of Medical Investigation (LIM 55), Urology Department, Medicine School, University of Sao Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo 01246-903, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3423-5647
Vanessa R GuimarãesLaboratory of Medical Investigation (LIM 55), Urology Department, Medicine School, University of Sao Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo 01246-903, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3021-722X
Gabriel A Dos SantosLaboratory of Medical Investigation (LIM 55), Urology Department, Medicine School, University of Sao Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo 01246-903, SP, Brazil.
Patrícia CandidoLaboratory of Medical Investigation (LIM 55), Urology Department, Medicine School, University of Sao Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo 01246-903, SP, Brazil.
Vitória GhazarianLaboratory of Medical Investigation (LIM 55), Urology Department, Medicine School, University of Sao Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo 01246-903, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9492-3767
Poliana RomãoLaboratory of Medical Investigation (LIM 55), Urology Department, Medicine School, University of Sao Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo 01246-903, SP, Brazil.
Iran A SilvaLaboratory of Medical Investigation (LIM 55), Urology Department, Medicine School, University of Sao Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo 01246-903, SP, Brazil.
Alexander BirbrairDepartment of Pathology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 30190-002, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1015-2561
Miguel SrougiLaboratory of Medical Investigation (LIM 55), Urology Department, Medicine School, University of Sao Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo 01246-903, SP, Brazil.
William C NahasUro-Oncology Group, Urology Department, University of São Paulo Medical School and Institute of Cancer Estate of São Paulo (ICESP), São Paulo 01246-000, SP, Brazil.
Kátia R LeiteLaboratory of Medical Investigation (LIM 55), Urology Department, Medicine School, University of Sao Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo 01246-903, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2615-7730
Ericka B TrarbachLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Endocrinology (LIM25), Endocrinology Departament, Medicine School, University of São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo 01246-903, SP, Brazil.
Sabrina T ReisLaboratory of Medical Investigation (LIM 55), Urology Department, Medicine School, University of Sao Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo 01246-903, SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

São Paulo Research Foundation 2017/17362-3São Paulo Research Foundation 2018/19906-3São Paulo Research Foundation 2019/00156-7São Paulo Research Foundation 2019/19138-9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) has a high prevalence and represents an important health problem, with an increased risk of metastasis. With the advance of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing, new possibilities have been created for investigating PCa. The technique is effective in knockout oncogenes, reducing tumor resistance. MMP9 and miR-21 target genes are associated with PCa progression; therefore, we evaluated the MMP-9 and miR-21 targets in PCa using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) of MMP9 and miR-21 sequences were inserted into a PX-330 plasmid, and transfected in DU145 and PC-3 PCa cell lines. MMP9 and RECK expression was assessed by qPCR, WB, and IF. The miR-21 targets, integrins, BAX and mTOR, were evaluated by qPCR. Flow cytometry was performed with Annexin5, 7-AAD and Ki67 markers. Invasion assays were performed with Matrigel. The miR-21 CRISPR-Cas9-edited cells upregulated RECK, MARCKS, BTG2, and PDCD4. CDH1, ITGB3 and ITGB1 were increased in MMP9 and miR-21 CRISPR-Cas9-edited cells. Increased BAX and decreased mTOR were observed in MMP9 and miR-21 CRISPR-Cas9-edited cells. Reduced cell proliferation, increased apoptosis and low invasion in MMP9 and miR-21 edited cells was observed, compared to Scramble. CRISPR-Cas9-edited cells of miR-21 and MMP9 attenuate cell proliferation, invasion and stimulate apoptosis, impeding PCa evolution.

Indexed as

Immediate-Early ProteinsMicroRNAsProstatic NeoplasmsApoptosis Regulatory Proteinsbcl-2-Associated X ProteinCRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGPI-Linked ProteinsHumansMaleMatrix Metalloproteinase 9RNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesTumor Suppressor ProteinsApoptosis Regulatory Proteinsbcl-2-Associated X ProteinBTG2 protein, humanGPI-Linked ProteinsImmediate-Early ProteinsMatrix Metalloproteinase 9MicroRNAsMIRN21 microRNA, humanMMP9 protein, humanPDCD4 protein, humanRECK protein, humanRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesTumor Suppressor ProteinsCRISPR-Cas9matrix metalloproteinasesmetastatic prostate cancermiR-21

Identifiers

PMID37834295
PMCPMC10573678
OpenAlexW4387304479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.