Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37833831›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational health

Inequality in workplace support for various types of precarious workers compared with permanent workers in Japan: A cross-sectional study.

Kosuke Sakai, Tomohisa Nagata, Kiminori Odagami, Nuri Purwito Adi, Masako Nagata, Koji Mori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kosuke SakaiDepartment of Occupational Health Practice and Management, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8211-0833
Tomohisa NagataDepartment of Occupational Health Practice and Management, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9173-420X
Kiminori OdagamiDepartment of Occupational Health Practice and Management, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6258-971X
Nuri Purwito AdiDepartment of Occupational Health Practice and Management, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6996-6135
Masako NagataDepartment of Occupational Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2459-2624
Koji MoriDepartment of Occupational Health Practice and Management, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8821-4438

Funding

Collabo Health study groupDAIDO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYHASEKO CorporationHitachi Systems, Ltd.Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP19K19471Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP22K10543Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare 20JA1005Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare 210401-01TIS Inc.University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this study was to examine, by sex, whether precarious workers in Japan receive less support in the workplace than permanent workers.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study using an online questionnaire in 2022. We stratified participants by sex and performed modified Poisson regression analysis. The outcomes were support from supervisors, co-workers, occupational health professionals, and no one. Adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) were calculated for contract workers, part-time workers, and dispatched workers, using permanent workers as reference.

resultsThis study had 21 047 participants. For men, 87.9% were permanent workers; for women, 50.7% were permanent workers and 37.3% were part-time workers. For workplace support, 47.5% of men and 45.2% of women selected superiors; 41.8% of men and 50.5% of women selected colleagues; 16.8% of men and 6.2% of women selected occupational health professionals. Female contract workers were less likely to receive support from their supervisors (aPR 0.88) or co-workers (aPR 0.89). Male part-time workers were less likely to be supported by their co-workers (aPR 0.86). Dispatched workers were less likely to be supported by their supervisors (men aPR 0.71, women aPR 0.84) and co-workers (men aPR 0.73, women aPR 0.77). Part-time and dispatched workers were less likely to receive support from occupational health professionals.

conclusionsPrecarious workers could get less workplace support than permanent workers. This may contribute to occupational health problems with precarious workers.

Indexed as

EmploymentWorkplaceCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJapanMaleSurveys and Questionnairescontract workerprecarious workertemporary workerworkplace support

Identifiers

PMID37833831
PMCPMC10576158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.