Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37833775›Full record

ArticleInfectious diseases of poverty2023

Immunization coverage, knowledge, satisfaction, and associated factors of non-National Immunization Program vaccines among migrant and left-behind families in China: evidence from Zhejiang and Henan provinces.

Yaguan Zhou, Duanhui Li, Yuan Cao, Fenhua Lai, Yu Wang, Qian Long, Zifan Zhang, Chuanbo An, Xiaolin Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious diseases of poverty, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Yaguan Zhou *School of Public Health, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yuhangtang Road 866, Hangzhou, 310058, Zhejiang, China.
Duanhui Li *School of Public Health, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yuhangtang Road 866, Hangzhou, 310058, Zhejiang, China.
Yuan CaoSchool of Public Health, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yuhangtang Road 866, Hangzhou, 310058, Zhejiang, China.
Fenhua LaiDepartment of Immunoprophylaxis, Xiaoshan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yu WangGlobal Health Research Center, Division of Social Sciences, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China.
Qian LongGlobal Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China.
Zifan ZhangSchool of Public Health, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yuhangtang Road 866, Hangzhou, 310058, Zhejiang, China.
Chuanbo AnSchool of Public Health, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yuhangtang Road 866, Hangzhou, 310058, Zhejiang, China.
Xiaolin XuSchool of Public Health, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yuhangtang Road 866, Hangzhou, 310058, Zhejiang, China. xiaolin.xu@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8203-9878
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNDuke Kunshan University · CNThe University of Queensland · AUXian Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNZhejiang Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMigrant and left-behind families are vulnerable in health services utilization, but little is known about their disparities in immunization of non-National Immunization Program (NIP) vaccines. This study aims to evaluate the immunization coverage, knowledge, satisfaction, and associated factors of non-NIP vaccines among local and migrant families in the urban areas and non-left-behind and left-behind families in the rural areas of China.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted in urban areas of Zhejiang and rural areas of Henan in China. A total of 1648 caregivers of children aged 1-6 years were interviewed face-to-face by a pre-designed online questionnaire, and their families were grouped into four types: local urban, migrant, non-left-behind, and left-behind. Non-NIP vaccines included Hemophilus influenza b (Hib) vaccine, varicella vaccine, rotavirus vaccine, enterovirus 71 vaccine (EV71) and 13-valent pneumonia vaccine (PCV13). Log-binomial regression models were used to calculate prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the difference on immunization coverage of children, and knowledge and satisfaction of caregivers among families. The network models were conducted to explore the interplay of immunization coverage, knowledge, and satisfaction. Logistic regression models with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were used to estimate the associated factors of non-NIP vaccination.

resultsThe immunization coverage of all non-NIP vaccines and knowledge of all items of local urban families was the highest, followed by migrant, non-left-behind and left-behind families. Compared with local urban children, the PRs (95% CIs) for getting all vaccinated were 0.65 (0.52-0.81), 0.29 (0.22-0.37) and 0.14 (0.09-0.21) among migrant children, non-left-behind children and left-behind children, respectively. The coverage-knowledge-satisfaction network model showed the core node was the satisfaction of vaccination schedule. Non-NIP vaccination was associated with characteristics of both children and caregivers, including age of children (> 2 years-OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.07-2.68 for local urban children; 2.67, 1.39-5.13 for migrant children; 3.09, 1.23-7.76 for non-left-behind children); and below caregivers' characteristics: family role (parents: 0.37, 0.14-0.99 for non-left-behind children), age (≤ 35 years: 7.27, 1.39-37.94 for non-left-behind children), sex (female: 0.49, 0.30-0.81 for local urban children; 0.31, 0.15-0.62 for non-left-behind children), physical health (more than average: 1.58, 1.07-2.35 for local urban children) and non-NIP vaccines knowledge (good: 0.45, 0.30-0.68 for local urban children; 7.54, 2.64-21.50 for left-behind children).

conclusionsThere were immunization disparities in non-NIP vaccines among migrant and left-behind families compared with their local counterparts. Non-NIP vaccination promotion strategies, including education on caregivers, and optimization of the immunization information system, should be delivered particularly among left-behind and migrant families.

Indexed as

Transients and MigrantsViral VaccinesChildChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansImmunization ProgramsInfantPersonal SatisfactionVaccinationVaccination CoverageViral VaccinesChinaImmunization coverageImmunization knowledgeImmunization satisfactionLeft-behind familyMigrant familyNon-National Immunization Program vaccines

Identifiers

PMID37833775
PMCPMC10571434
OpenAlexW4387607463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.