Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37833731›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular ultrasound2023

Deep learning for automated left ventricular outflow tract diameter measurements in 2D echocardiography.

Sigurd Zijun Zha, Magnus Rogstadkjernet, Lars Gunnar Klæboe, Helge Skulstad, Bjørn-Jostein Singstad, Andrew Gilbert, Thor Edvardsen, Eigil Samset, Pål Haugar Brekke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular ultrasound, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sigurd Zijun ZhaUniversity of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. sigzha@gmail.com.
Magnus RogstadkjernetUniversity of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Lars Gunnar KlæboeOslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Helge SkulstadUniversity of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Bjørn-Jostein SingstadOslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Andrew GilbertGE HealthCare, Oslo, Norway.
Thor EdvardsenUniversity of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Eigil SamsetUniversity of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Pål Haugar BrekkeOslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

The Research Council of Norway Project number 271555/F20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeasurement of the left ventricular outflow tract diameter (LVOTd) in echocardiography is a common source of error when used to calculate the stroke volume. The aim of this study is to assess whether a deep learning (DL) model, trained on a clinical echocardiographic dataset, can perform automatic LVOTd measurements on par with expert cardiologists.

methodsData consisted of 649 consecutive transthoracic echocardiographic examinations of patients with coronary artery disease admitted to a university hospital. 1304 LVOTd measurements in the parasternal long axis (PLAX) and zoomed parasternal long axis views (ZPLAX) were collected, with each patient having 1-6 measurements per examination. Data quality control was performed by an expert cardiologist, and spatial geometry data was preserved for each LVOTd measurement to convert DL predictions into metric units. A convolutional neural network based on the U-Net was used as the DL model.

resultsThe mean absolute LVOTd error was 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-1.19) mm for DL predictions on the test set. The mean relative LVOTd errors across all data subgroups ranged from 3.8 to 5.1% for the test set. Generally, the DL model had superior performance on the ZPLAX view compared to the PLAX view. DL model precision for patients with repeated LVOTd measurements had a mean coefficient of variation of 2.2 (95% CI 1.6-2.7) %, which was comparable to the clinicians for the test set.

conclusionDL for automatic LVOTd measurements in PLAX and ZPLAX views is feasible when trained on a limited clinical dataset. While the DL predicted LVOTd measurements were within the expected range of clinical inter-observer variability, the robustness of the DL model requires validation on independent datasets. Future experiments using temporal information and anatomical constraints could improve valvular identification and reduce outliers, which are challenges that must be addressed before clinical utilization.

Indexed as

Deep LearningBenzoatesEchocardiographyHeartHumansSodium Dodecyl SulfateStroke VolumeBenzoatesPlaxSodium Dodecyl SulfateAutomated measurementsDeep learningLeft ventricular outflow tractMachine learningTransthoracic echocardiography

Identifiers

PMID37833731
PMCPMC10571406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.