Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37833636›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2023

Semantic characteristic grading of pulmonary nodules based on deep neural networks.

Caixia Liu, Ruibin Zhao, Mingyong Pang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caixia LiuCollege of Intelligent Education, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Ruibin ZhaoCollege of Intelligent Education, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Mingyong PangInstitute of EduInfo Science and Engineering, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China. panion@netease.com.
Jiangsu Normal University · CNNanjing Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate grading of semantic characteristics is helpful for radiologists to determine the probabilities of the likelihood of malignancy of a pulmonary nodule. Nevertheless, because of the complex and varied properties of pulmonary nodules, assessing semantic characteristics (SC) is a difficult task.

methodIn this paper, we first analyze a set of important semantic characteristics of pulmonary nodules and extract the important SCs relating to pulmonary nodule malignancy by Pearson's correlation approach. Then, we propose three automatic SC grading models based on deep belief network (DBN) and a multi-branch convolutional neural network (CNN) classifier, MBCNN. The first DBN model takes grayscale and binary nodule images as the input, and the second DBN model takes grayscale nodule images and 72 features extracted from pulmonary nodules as the input.

resultsExperimental results indicate that our algorithms can achieve satisfying results on semantic characteristic grading. Especially, the MBCNN can obtain higher semantic characteristic grading results with an average accuracy of 89.37%.

conclusionsQuantitative and automatic grading of semantic characteristics proposed in this paper can assist radiologists effectively assess the likelihood of pulmonary nodules being malignant and further promote the early expectant treatment of malignant nodules.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsMultiple Pulmonary NodulesSolitary Pulmonary NoduleHumansNeural Networks, ComputerRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSemanticsTomography, X-Ray ComputedCorrelationDeep neural networkMalignancyPulmonary noduleSemantic characteristic

Identifiers

PMID37833636
PMCPMC10571455
OpenAlexW4387616399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.