ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2024
Convolutional Neural Network for Fully Automated Cerebellar Volumetry in Children in Comparison to Manual Segmentation and Developmental Trajectory of Cerebellar Volumes.
Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning-based cerebellar segmentation on T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging for detecting cerebellar hypoplasia/atrophy in infants.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Validation of an AI model for pediatric myelin maturation age assessment and benefits for junior radiologists.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop a fully automated and reliable volumetry of the cerebellum of children during infancy and childhood using deep learning algorithms in comparison to manual segmentation. In addition, the clinical usefulness of measuring the cerebellar volume is shown. One hundred patients (0 to 16.3 years old) without infratentorial signal abnormalities on conventional MRI were retrospectively selected from our pool of pediatric MRI examinations. Based on a routinely acquired 3D T1-weighted magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo (MPRAGE) sequence, the cerebella were manually segmented using ITK-SNAP. The data set of all 100 cases was divided into four splits (four-fold cross-validation) to train the network (NN) to delineate the boundaries of the cerebellum. First, the accuracy of the newly created neural network was compared with the manual segmentation. Secondly, age-related volume changes were investigated. Our trained NN achieved an excellent Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.99, a Dice Coefficient of 95.0 ± 2.1%, and an intersection over union (IoU) of 90.6 ± 3.8%. Cerebellar volume increased continuously with age, showing an exponentially rapid growth within the first year of life. Using a convolutional neural network, it was possible to achieve reliable, fully automated cerebellar volume measurements in childhood and infancy, even when based on a relatively small cohort. In this preliminary study, age-dependent cerebellar volume changes could be acquired.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.