Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37833546›Full record

ArticleClinical neuroradiology2024

Long-term Follow-up After Aneurysm Treatment with the Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED) Flow Diverter.

Sophia Hohenstatt, Christian Ulfert, Christian Herweh, Tim Hilgenfeld, Niclas Schmitt, Silvia Schönenberger, Min Chen, Martin Bendszus, Markus A Möhlenbruch, Dominik F Vollherbst

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sophia HohenstattDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0951-3948
Christian UlfertDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christian HerwehDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Tim HilgenfeldDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Niclas SchmittDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Silvia SchönenbergerDepartment of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Min ChenDepartment of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin BendszusDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus A MöhlenbruchDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Dominik F VollherbstDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. dominik.vollherbst@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study focuses on long-term outcomes after aneurysm treatment with either the Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device (FRED) or the FRED Jr. to investigate the durability of treatment effect and long-term complications.

methodsThis study is based on a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained patient data base. Patients treated with either FRED or FRED Jr. between 2013 and 2017 at our institution, and thus a possibility for ≥ 5 years of follow-up, were included. Aneurysm occlusion rates, recurrence rates, modified Rankin scale score shifts to baseline, and delayed complications were assessed.

resultsIn this study 68 patients with 84 aneurysms had long-term follow-up with a mean duration of 57.3 months and 44 patients harboring 52 aneurysms had a follow-up ≥ 5 years with a mean follow-up period of 69.2 months. Complete occlusion was reached in 77.4% at 2 years and increased to 84.9% when the latest available imaging result was considered. Younger age and the absence of branch involvement were predictors for aneurysm occlusion in linear regression analysis. After the 2‑year threshold, there were 3 reported symptomatic non-serious adverse events. Of these, one patient had a minor stroke, one a transitory ischemic attack and one had persistent mass effect symptoms due to a giant aneurysm, none of these resulted in subsequent neurological disability.

conclusionThis long-term follow-up study demonstrates that the FRED and FRED Jr. are safe and effective for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms in the long term, with high rates of complete occlusion and low rates of delayed adverse events.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresIntracranial AneurysmFollow-Up StudiesHumansRetrospective StudiesStentsTreatment OutcomeCerebral aneurysmEmbolizationFlow diverter stentIntraluminal deviceLong-term outcome

Identifiers

PMID37833546
PMCPMC10881684
OpenAlexW4387614363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.