Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37833509›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023

Active learning for extracting surgomic features in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a prospective annotation study.

Johanna M Brandenburg, Alexander C Jenke, Antonia Stern, Marie T J Daum, André Schulze, Rayan Younis, Philipp Petrynowski, Tornike Davitashvili, Vincent Vanat, Nithya Bhasker and 15 more

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Stream-based active learning for surgical AI.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Johanna M Brandenburg *Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Alexander C Jenke *Department of Translational Surgical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany.
Antonia SternCorporate Research and Technology, Karl Storz SE & Co KG, Tuttlingen, Germany.
Marie T J DaumDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
André SchulzeDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Rayan YounisDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Philipp PetrynowskiDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Tornike DavitashviliDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Vincent VanatDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Nithya BhaskerDepartment of Translational Surgical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany.
Sophia SchneiderCorporate Research and Technology, Karl Storz SE & Co KG, Tuttlingen, Germany.
Lars MündermannCorporate Research and Technology, Karl Storz SE & Co KG, Tuttlingen, Germany.
Annika ReinkeDepartment of Intelligent Medical Systems (IMSY), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Fiona R KolbingerGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Vanessa JörnsInstitute of Medical Informatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Fleur Fritz-KebedeInstitute of Medical Informatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin DugasInstitute of Medical Informatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Lena Maier-HeinDepartment of Intelligent Medical Systems (IMSY), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Rosa KlotzDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Marius DistlerGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Jürgen WeitzGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Beat P Müller-StichNational Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.
Stefanie SpeidelDepartment of Translational Surgical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany.
Sebastian Bodenstedt *Department of Translational Surgical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany.
Martin Wagner *Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. martin.wagner@ukdd.de.ORCID 0000-0002-9831-9110

Funding

Bundesministerium für Gesundheit 2520DAT82
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith Surgomics, we aim for personalized prediction of the patient's surgical outcome using machine-learning (ML) on multimodal intraoperative data to extract surgomic features as surgical process characteristics. As high-quality annotations by medical experts are crucial, but still a bottleneck, we prospectively investigate active learning (AL) to reduce annotation effort and present automatic recognition of surgomic features.

methodsTo establish a process for development of surgomic features, ten video-based features related to bleeding, as highly relevant intraoperative complication, were chosen. They comprise the amount of blood and smoke in the surgical field, six instruments, and two anatomic structures. Annotation of selected frames from robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomies was performed by at least three independent medical experts. To test whether AL reduces annotation effort, we performed a prospective annotation study comparing AL with equidistant sampling (EQS) for frame selection. Multiple Bayesian ResNet18 architectures were trained on a multicentric dataset, consisting of 22 videos from two centers.

resultsIn total, 14,004 frames were tag annotated. A mean F1-score of 0.75 ± 0.16 was achieved for all features. The highest F1-score was achieved for the instruments (mean 0.80 ± 0.17). This result is also reflected in the inter-rater-agreement (1-rater-kappa > 0.82). Compared to EQS, AL showed better recognition results for the instruments with a significant difference in the McNemar test comparing correctness of predictions. Moreover, in contrast to EQS, AL selected more frames of the four less common instruments (1512 vs. 607 frames) and achieved higher F1-scores for common instruments while requiring less training frames.

conclusionWe presented ten surgomic features relevant for bleeding events in esophageal surgery automatically extracted from surgical video using ML. AL showed the potential to reduce annotation effort while keeping ML performance high for selected features. The source code and the trained models are published open source.

Indexed as

EsophagectomyRoboticsBayes TheoremHumansMachine LearningMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresProspective StudiesArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMinimally invasive surgeryPrecision medicineSurgical data scienceSurgomics

Identifiers

PMID37833509
PMCPMC10615926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.