Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37833503›Full record

ArticleJournal of plant research2024

A new mathematical model of phyllotaxis to solve the genuine puzzle spiromonostichy.

Takaaki Yonekura, Munetaka Sugiyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of plant research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Takaaki YonekuraDepartment of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan. t.yonekura@bs.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5428-8212
Munetaka SugiyamaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan. sugiyama@bs.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7050-8964

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 18J12309Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 23K14205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arrangement of plant leaves around the stem, termed phyllotaxis, exhibits beautiful and mysterious regularities and has been one of the most attractive subjects of biological pattern formation. After the long history of studies on phyllotaxis, it is now widely accepted that the inhibitory effect of existing leaf primordia on new primordium formation determines phyllotactic patterning. However, costoid phyllotaxis unique to Costaceae of Zingiberales, displaying spiromonostichy characterized by a steep spiral with a small divergence angle, seems to disagree with the inhibitory effect-based mechanism and has remained as a "genuine puzzle". We developed a new mathematical model, hypothesizing that each leaf primordium exerts not only the inhibitory effect but also some inductive effect. Computer simulations with the new model successfully generated a spiromonostichous pattern when these two effects met a certain relationship. The obtained spiromonostichy matched the real costoid phyllotaxis observed with Costus megalobractea, particularly for the decrease of the divergence angle associated with the enlargement of the shoot apical meristem. The new model was also shown to be able to produce a one-sided distichous pattern that is seen in phyllotaxis of a few plants of Zingiberales and has never been addressed in the previous model studies. These results implicated inductive as well as inhibitory mechanisms in phyllotactic patterning, at least in Zingiberales.

Indexed as

MeristemPlant LeavesHumansModels, BiologicalPlantsCostusMathematical modelingPattern formationPhyllotaxisSpiromonostichy

Identifiers

PMID37833503
PMCPMC10764405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.