Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37833455›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma in real-life clinical practice: results of a multicentric, retrospective study.

Melinda Váradi, Orsolya Horváth, Orsolya Módos, Tamás Fazekas, Camilla M Grunewald, Günter Niegisch, Ulrich Krafft, Viktor Grünwald, Boris Hadaschik, Csilla Olah and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Melinda VáradiDepartment of Urology, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 78/B, Budapest, 1082, Hungary.
Orsolya HorváthDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology and Pharmacology, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary.
Orsolya MódosDepartment of Urology, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 78/B, Budapest, 1082, Hungary.
Tamás FazekasDepartment of Urology, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 78/B, Budapest, 1082, Hungary.
Camilla M GrunewaldDepartment of Urology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Günter NiegischDepartment of Urology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Ulrich KrafftDepartment of Urology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Viktor GrünwaldDepartment of Urology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Boris HadaschikDepartment of Urology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Csilla OlahDepartment of Urology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Anikó MarázDepartment of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Andrea FurkaDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Miklós SzűcsDepartment of Urology, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 78/B, Budapest, 1082, Hungary.
Péter NyirádyDepartment of Urology, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 78/B, Budapest, 1082, Hungary.
Tibor SzarvasDepartment of Urology, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 78/B, Budapest, 1082, Hungary. szarvas.tibor@semmelweis.hu.
Semmelweis University · HUUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DENational Institute of Oncology · HUUniversity of Debrecen · HUUniversity of Szeged · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical trials revealed significant antitumor activity for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Due to their strict eligibility criteria, clinical trials include selected patient cohorts, and thus do not necessarily represent real-world population outcomes. In this multicentric, retrospective study, we investigated real-world data to assess the effectiveness of pembrolizumab and atezolizumab and to evaluate the prognostic value of routinely available clinicopathological and laboratory parameters. Clinical and follow-up data from mUC patients who received ICIs (01/2017-12/2021) were evaluated. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and duration of response (DOR) were used as endpoints. Patients' (n = 210, n = 76 atezolizumab and 134 pembrolizumab) median OS and PFS were 13.6 and 5.9 months, respectively. Impaired ECOG-PS, the presence of visceral, liver or bone metastases, and hemoglobin levels were independently associated with poor OS and DCR. Furthermore, Bellmunt risk factors and the enhanced Bellmunt-CRP score were shown to be prognostic for OS, PFS and DCR. In conclusion, ICIs are effective treatments for a broad range of mUC patients. Our results confirmed the prognostic value of numerous risk factors and showed that Bellmunt risk scores can further be improved when adding CRP to the model.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsRadioimmunotherapyRetrospective StudiesImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID37833455
PMCPMC10575904
OpenAlexW4387616251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.