SynthesisDigestive diseases and sciences2023
What Is the Optimal Bowel Preparation for Capsule Colonoscopy and Pan-intestinal Capsule Endoscopy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07206329 (A Prospective Study Comparing Ultra-Low Volume Bowel Preparations for Capsule Colonoscopy and Pan-Intestinal Capsule Endoscopy), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective Study Comparing Ultra-Low Volume Bowel Preparations for Capsule Colonoscopy and Pan-Intestinal Capsule Endoscopy: Efficacy of 1L Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid vs. Sodium Picosulfate With Magnesium Citrate
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of 1 L PEG Ascorbate vs Sodium Picosulfate With Magnesium Citrate Bowel Preparations for Capsule Colonoscopy and Pan-Intestinal Capsule Endoscopy: A Prospective Study.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2026Trial
- Concordance Between Pan-Intestinal Capsule Endoscopy and Colonoscopy for the Detection and Characterization of Colonic Lesions: Post Hoc Analysis on the Impact of Colonic Transit Time.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Inter- and Intra-Observer Reliability for Colon Capsule CLEansing Assessment and Report.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Prospective, Multicentre Feasibility Study of Remote Colon Capsule Endoscopy Using the OMOM CC100 System.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted versus conventional reading in pan-intestinal capsule endoscopy for suspected mid-lower gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Best Approach for Incomplete Colonoscopy: Colon Capsule Endoscopy or Repeat Conventional Colonoscopy?GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Integration of Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Capsule Endoscopy in Clinical Practice: A Review of Market-Available Tools for Clinical Practice.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Review
- Can Salivary Biomarkers Serve as Diagnostic and Prognostic Tools for Early Detection in Patients with Colorectal Cancer? A Systematic Review.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Polyp Matching in Colon Capsule Endoscopy: Pioneering CCE-Colonoscopy Integration Towards an AI-Driven Future.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- A Comprehensive Review of Artificial Intelligence and Colon Capsule Endoscopy: Opportunities and Challenges.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Capsule endoscopy and panendoscopy: A journey to the future of gastrointestinal endoscopy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Marking 25 years of capsule endoscopy: from bold innovation to enduring legacy.Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopyArticle
- Optimizing bowel preparation regimens for colon capsule endoscopy: an umbrella review (overview of systematic reviews).Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe rate of adequate cleansing (ACR) and complete examinations (CR) are key quality indicators in capsule colonoscopy (CC) and pan-intestinal capsule endoscopy (PCE).
aimsTo evaluate the efficacy of bowel preparation protocols regarding ACR and CR.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, search terms regarding colon capsule preparation, publication date from 2006/01, and date of search 2021/12, in six bibliographic databases. Multiple steps of the cleansing protocol were assessed: diet, adjunctive laxatives, purgative solution, use of prokinetic agents, and "booster". The meta-analytical frequency of ACR and CR was estimated, and subgroup analyses performed. Strategies associated with higher ACR and CR were explored using meta-analytical univariable and multivariable regression models.
resultsTwenty-six observational studies and five RCTs included (n = 4072 patients). The pooled rate of ACR was 72.5% (95% C.I. 67.8-77.5%; I
conclusionsMain quality outcomes (ACR, CR) remain suboptimal for CC and PCE. Despite considerable heterogeneity, our results support low-fibre diet, use of adjunctive sennosides, split dose < 4L PEG, and routine prokinetics, while NaP remains the most consistent option as booster.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.