Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37833371›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A Monte Carlo model of the Dingo thermal neutron imaging beamline.

Klaudiusz Jakubowski, Andrew Chacon, Linh T Tran, Attila Stopic, Ulf Garbe, Joseph Bevitt, Scott Olsen, Daniel R Franklin, Anatoly Rosenfeld, Susanna Guatelli and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Klaudiusz JakubowskiCentre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Andrew ChaconAustralian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Sydney, NSW 2234, Australia.
Linh T TranCentre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Attila StopicAustralian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Sydney, NSW 2234, Australia.
Ulf GarbeAustralian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Sydney, NSW 2234, Australia.
Joseph BevittAustralian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Sydney, NSW 2234, Australia.
Scott OlsenAustralian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Sydney, NSW 2234, Australia.
Daniel R FranklinSchool of Electrical and Data Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.
Anatoly RosenfeldCentre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Susanna GuatelliCentre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Mitra Safavi-NaeiniCentre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia. mitras@ansto.gov.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we present a validated Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation model of the Dingo thermal neutron imaging beamline at the Australian Centre for Neutron Scattering. The model, constructed using CAD drawings of the entire beam transport path and shielding structures, is designed to precisely predict the in-beam neutron field at the position at the sample irradiation stage. The model's performance was assessed by comparing simulation results to various experimental measurements, including planar thermal neutron distribution obtained in-beam using gold foil activation and [Formula: see text]B[Formula: see text]C-coated microdosimeters and the out-of-beam neutron spectra measured with Bonner spheres. The simulation results demonstrated that the predicted neutron fluence at the field's centre is within 8.1% and 2.1% of the gold foil and [Formula: see text]B[Formula: see text]C-coated microdosimeter measurements, respectively. The logarithms of the ratios of average simulated to experimental fluences in the thermal (E[Formula: see text] 0.414 eV), epithermal (0.414 eV < E[Formula: see text] 11.7 keV) and fast (E[Formula: see text] 11.7 keV) spectral regions were approximately - 0.03 to + 0.1, - 0.2 to + 0.15, and - 0.4 to + 0.2, respectively. Furthermore, the predicted thermal, epithermal and fast neutron components in-beam at the sample stage position constituted approximately 18%, 64% and 18% of the total neutron fluence.

Identifiers

PMID37833371
PMCPMC10575880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.