Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37833270›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

A nanoscale view of the origin of boiling and its dynamics.

Mirko Gallo, Francesco Magaletti, Anastasios Georgoulas, Marco Marengo, Joel De Coninck, Carlo Massimo Casciola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mirko GalloSapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. mirko.gallo@uniroma1.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3395-2246
Francesco MagalettiSchool of Architecture, Technology and Engineering, University of Brighton, Lewes Road, Brighton, UK.
Anastasios GeorgoulasSchool of Architecture, Technology and Engineering, University of Brighton, Lewes Road, Brighton, UK.
Marco MarengoSchool of Architecture, Technology and Engineering, University of Brighton, Lewes Road, Brighton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3195-4945
Joel De ConinckSchool of Architecture, Technology and Engineering, University of Brighton, Lewes Road, Brighton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9702-4628
Carlo Massimo CasciolaSapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8795-4517

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, we present a dynamical theory of boiling based on fluctuating hydrodynamics and the diffuse interface approach. The model is able to describe boiling from the stochastic nucleation up to the macroscopic bubble dynamics. It covers, with a modest computational cost, the mesoscale area from nano to micrometers, where most of the controversial observations related to the phenomenon originate. In particular, the role of wettability in the macroscopic observables of boiling is elucidated. In addition, by comparing the ideal case of boiling on ultra-smooth surfaces with a chemically heterogeneous wall, our results will definitively shed light on the puzzling low onset temperatures measured in experiments. Sporadic nanometric spots of hydrophobic wettability will be shown to be enough to trigger the nucleation at low superheat, significantly reducing the temperature of boiling onset, in line with experimental results. The proposed mesoscale approach constitutes the missing link between macroscopic approaches and molecular dynamics simulations and will open a breakthrough pathway toward accurate understanding and prediction.

Identifiers

PMID37833270
PMCPMC10576093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.