Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37832751›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cancer biology2023

One label is all you need: Interpretable AI-enhanced histopathology for oncology.

Thomas E Tavolara, Ziyu Su, Metin N Gurcan, M Khalid Khan Niazi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cancer biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Few-shot Tumor Bud Segmentation Using Generative Model in Colorectal Carcinoma.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024
    Article
  14. Enhancing Colorectal Cancer Tumor Bud Detection Using Deep Learning from Routine H&E-Stained Slides.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024
    Article
  15. Adapting SAM to Histopathology Images for Tumor Bud Segmentation in Colorectal Cancer.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas E TavolaraCenter for Artificial Intelligence Research, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Ziyu SuCenter for Artificial Intelligence Research, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Metin N GurcanCenter for Artificial Intelligence Research, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
M Khalid Khan NiaziCenter for Artificial Intelligence Research, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. Electronic address: mniazi@wakehealth.edu.

Funding

Computer-assisted diagnosis of ear pathologies by combining digital otoscopy with complementary data using machine learningR01DC020715 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Metin Nafi Gurcan, Aaron C Moberly · 2023 to 2026
$2.5M
An ensemble deep learning model for tumor bud detection and risk stratification in colorectal carcinoma.R01CA276301 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Wei Chen, Muhammad Khalid Khan Niazi · 2023 to 2026
$2.0M
Development of quantitative tools to predict patients with difficult intubation to minimize treatment related complicationsR21EB029493 · NIBIB · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI NIAZI, MUHAMMAD KHALID KHAN, SEGAL, SCOTT · 2021 to 2023
$620k
Efficient and cost-effective breast cancer risk stratification using whole slide histopathology imagesR21CA273665 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GURCAN, METIN NAFI · 2023 to 2024
$394k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA276301NCI NIH HHS R21 CA273665NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB029493NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC020715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI)-enhanced histopathology presents unprecedented opportunities to benefit oncology through interpretable methods that require only one overall label per hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slide with no tissue-level annotations. We present a structured review of these methods organized by their degree of verifiability and by commonly recurring application areas in oncological characterization. First, we discuss morphological markers (tumor presence/absence, metastases, subtypes, grades) in which AI-identified regions of interest (ROIs) within whole slide images (WSIs) verifiably overlap with pathologist-identified ROIs. Second, we discuss molecular markers (gene expression, molecular subtyping) that are not verified via H&E but rather based on overlap with positive regions on adjacent tissue. Third, we discuss genetic markers (mutations, mutational burden, microsatellite instability, chromosomal instability) that current technologies cannot verify if AI methods spatially resolve specific genetic alterations. Fourth, we discuss the direct prediction of survival to which AI-identified histopathological features quantitatively correlate but are nonetheless not mechanistically verifiable. Finally, we discuss in detail several opportunities and challenges for these one-label-per-slide methods within oncology. Opportunities include reducing the cost of research and clinical care, reducing the workload of clinicians, personalized medicine, and unlocking the full potential of histopathology through new imaging-based biomarkers. Current challenges include explainability and interpretability, validation via adjacent tissue sections, reproducibility, data availability, computational needs, data requirements, domain adaptability, external validation, dataset imbalances, and finally commercialization and clinical potential. Ultimately, the relative ease and minimum upfront cost with which relevant data can be collected in addition to the plethora of available AI methods for outcome-driven analysis will surmount these current limitations and achieve the innumerable opportunities associated with AI-driven histopathology for the benefit of oncology.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceChromosomal InstabilityEosine Yellowish-(YS)HumansMedical OncologyReproducibility of ResultsEosine Yellowish-(YS)Artificial intelligenceChromosomal instabilityExplainable AIGene expressionGenetic markersHistopathologyHomologous recombination deficiencyInterpretable AIMetastasisMicrosatellite instabilityMolecular markersMolecular subtypingMorphological markersMultiple instance learningMutational burdenTumor detectionTumor gradingTumor subtypingVerifiable AIWeakly supervised

Identifiers

PMID37832751
PMCPMC13185492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.