ReviewSeminars in cancer biology2023
One label is all you need: Interpretable AI-enhanced histopathology for oncology.
Review in Seminars in cancer biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Dermatopathology: An Update and Review of the Current Literature.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- SHIELD: An AI Framework for Skeletal Health Intelligence and Early Lesion Detection to Improve Orthopedic Referrals.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based pathomics signature predicts prognosis and treatment response in gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Tumor cell- and infiltrating immune cell-based supervised learning artificial intelligence multimodal platform for tumor prognosis.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Single-cell Resolved Oncogene Co-expression: From Principles to Clinical Impact.Blood cancer discovery · 2025Article
- Emerging artificial intelligence-driven precision therapies in tumor drug resistance: recent advances, opportunities, and challenges.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Robust ROI Detection in Whole Slide Images Guided by Pathologists' Viewing Patterns.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a deep learning-based pathomics signature for prognosis and chemotherapy benefits in colorectal cancer: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Weakly supervised pathological differentiation of primary central nervous system lymphoma and glioblastoma on multi-site whole slide images.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- Cross-Attention-Based Saliency Inference for Predicting Cancer Metastasis on Whole Slide Images.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2024Article
- Deep Learning Model for Predicting Lung Adenocarcinoma Recurrence from Whole Slide Images.Cancers · 2024Article
- Few-shot Tumor Bud Segmentation Using Generative Model in Colorectal Carcinoma.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024Article
- Enhancing Colorectal Cancer Tumor Bud Detection Using Deep Learning from Routine H&E-Stained Slides.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024Article
- Adapting SAM to Histopathology Images for Tumor Bud Segmentation in Colorectal Cancer.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024Article
- Digital pathology and multimodal learning on oncology data.BJR artificial intelligence · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI)-enhanced histopathology presents unprecedented opportunities to benefit oncology through interpretable methods that require only one overall label per hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slide with no tissue-level annotations. We present a structured review of these methods organized by their degree of verifiability and by commonly recurring application areas in oncological characterization. First, we discuss morphological markers (tumor presence/absence, metastases, subtypes, grades) in which AI-identified regions of interest (ROIs) within whole slide images (WSIs) verifiably overlap with pathologist-identified ROIs. Second, we discuss molecular markers (gene expression, molecular subtyping) that are not verified via H&E but rather based on overlap with positive regions on adjacent tissue. Third, we discuss genetic markers (mutations, mutational burden, microsatellite instability, chromosomal instability) that current technologies cannot verify if AI methods spatially resolve specific genetic alterations. Fourth, we discuss the direct prediction of survival to which AI-identified histopathological features quantitatively correlate but are nonetheless not mechanistically verifiable. Finally, we discuss in detail several opportunities and challenges for these one-label-per-slide methods within oncology. Opportunities include reducing the cost of research and clinical care, reducing the workload of clinicians, personalized medicine, and unlocking the full potential of histopathology through new imaging-based biomarkers. Current challenges include explainability and interpretability, validation via adjacent tissue sections, reproducibility, data availability, computational needs, data requirements, domain adaptability, external validation, dataset imbalances, and finally commercialization and clinical potential. Ultimately, the relative ease and minimum upfront cost with which relevant data can be collected in addition to the plethora of available AI methods for outcome-driven analysis will surmount these current limitations and achieve the innumerable opportunities associated with AI-driven histopathology for the benefit of oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.