Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37832389›Full record

ArticleESMO open2023

Prognostic value of comorbidities in older patients with cancer: the ELCAPA cohort study.

M-A Benderra, A G Serrano, E Paillaud, C M Tapia, T Cudennec, C Chouaïd, E Lorisson, A de la Taille, M Laurent, E Brain and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Precision Oncology in Older Cancer Patients: A Single-Center Experience.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

M-A BenderraUniversité Paris-Est Créteil, INSERM, IMRB, Créteil, France; AP-HP, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Public Health Department & Clinical Research Unit (URC Mondor), Créteil, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France; Department of Medical Oncology, AP-HP, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France. Electronic address: marc-antoine.benderra@aphp.fr.
A G SerranoUniversité Paris-Est Créteil, INSERM, IMRB, Créteil, France; AP-HP, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Public Health Department & Clinical Research Unit (URC Mondor), Créteil, France.
E PaillaudUniversité Paris-Est Créteil, INSERM, IMRB, Créteil, France; Department of Geriatrics, AP-HP, HEGP Hospital, Paris, France.
C M TapiaUniversité Paris-Est Créteil, INSERM, IMRB, Créteil, France; AP-HP, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Public Health Department & Clinical Research Unit (URC Mondor), Créteil, France.
T CudennecDepartment of Geriatrics, AP-HP, Ambroise-Paré Hospital, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
C ChouaïdDepartment of Geriatrics, Centre Hospitalier Inter-Communal de Creteil (CHIC), Creteil, France.
E LorissonDepartment of Geriatrics, Centre Hospitalier Inter-Communal de Creteil (CHIC), Creteil, France.
A de la TailleDepartment of Urology, AP-HP, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Université de Paris Est, Créteil, France.
M LaurentUniversité Paris-Est Créteil, INSERM, IMRB, Créteil, France; Department of Geriatrics, AP-HP, Hopitaux Henri-Mondor/Emile Roux, Limeil-Brevannes, France.
E BrainDepartment of Clinical Research & Medical Oncology, Institut Curie (Hôpital René Huguenin), Saint-Cloud, France.
M BringuierDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Department of Supportive Care, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France.
J GligorovInstitut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France; Department of Medical Oncology, AP-HP, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France.
P CailletUniversité Paris-Est Créteil, INSERM, IMRB, Créteil, France; Department of Geriatrics, AP-HP, HEGP Hospital, Paris, France.
F Canoui-PoitrïneUniversité Paris-Est Créteil, INSERM, IMRB, Créteil, France; AP-HP, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Public Health Department & Clinical Research Unit (URC Mondor), Créteil, France.
Inserm · FRHôpital Intercommunal de Créteil · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRHôpital René Huguenin · FRInstitut Curie · FRSorbonne Université · FRUniversité Paris-Est Créteil · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn older patients, comorbidities competed with cancer for mortality risk. We assessed the prognostic value of comorbidities in older patients with cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe analysed all patients >70 years of age with colorectal, breast, prostate, or lung cancer included in the prospective ELCAPA cohort. The Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatrics (CIRS-G) score was used to assess comorbidities. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) at 3, 12, and 36 months. The adjusted difference in the restricted mean survival time (RMST) was used to assess the strength of the relationship between comorbidities and survival.

resultsOf the 1551 patients included (median age 82 years; interquartile range 78-86 years), 502 (32%), 575 (38%), 283 (18%), and 191 (12%) had colorectal, breast, prostate, and lung cancer, respectively, and 50% had metastatic disease. Hypertension, kidney failure, and cognitive impairment were the most common comorbidities (67%, 38%, and 29% of the patients, respectively). A CIRS-G score >17, two or more severe comorbidities, more than seven comorbidities, heart failure, and cognitive impairment were independently associated with shorter OS. The greatest effect size was observed for CIRS-G >17 (versus CIRS-G <11): at 36 months, the adjusted differences in the RMST (95% confidence interval) were -6.0 months (-9.3 to -2.6 months) for colorectal cancer, -9.1 months (-13.2 to -4.9 months) for breast cancer, -8.3 months (-12.8 to -3.9 months) for prostate cancer, and -5.5 months (-9.9 to -1.1 months) for lung cancer (P < 0.05 for all).

conclusionsComorbidities' type, number, and severity were independently associated with shorter OS. A 17-point cut-off over 56 for the total CIRS-G score could be considered in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesHumansMalePrognosisProspective StudiescancerCIRS-Gcomorbiditiesgeriatric assessment

Identifiers

PMID37832389
PMCPMC10594025
OpenAlexW4387525317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.