Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37832324›Full record

ArticleClinical imaging2023

Rate of benign nodule resection in a lung cancer screening program.

Raquelle El Alam, Suzanne C Byrne, Mark M Hammer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Improving lung cancer screening diagnostic efficiency.Current opinion in pulmonary medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raquelle El AlamDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Suzanne C ByrneDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Mark M HammerDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America. Electronic address: mmhammer@bwh.harvard.edu.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Optimizing Lung Cancer Screening Nodule EvaluationR01CA260889 · NCI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI KONG, CHUNG YIN, SIGEL, KEITH MAGNUS · 2021 to 2025
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA260889
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeScreening with low dose computed tomography (CT) can reduce lung cancer related death at the expense of unavoidable false positive results. The purpose of this study is to measure the rate of surgery for benign nodules, and evaluate characteristics of those nodules. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this study, we evaluated patients in the Lung Cancer Screening (LCS) program across a large tertiary healthcare network from 5/2015 through 10/2021 who underwent surgical resection for a lung nodule. We reviewed the pathology reports and subsequent follow-up to establish whether the nodule was benign or malignant. Imaging characteristics of the nodules were evaluated by a radiology fellow, and we recorded Lung-RADS category, nodule status (baseline, stable, new, growing), FDG uptake on PET/CT, and calculated the risk from the Brock model.

resultsDuring this time period, a total of 21,366 LCS CT was performed in 9050 patients, and 260 patients underwent a following surgical resection. Review of the pathology results revealed: 220 lung cancer (85%), 2 other malignancies (1%), and 38 benign findings (15%). Pathology of the benign nodules was as follows: 12 with scarring/fibrosis, 5 with benign neoplasms, 14 with infection/inflammation, and 7 with other diagnoses. Lung-RADS category was as follows: 4 (11%) Lung-RADS 2, 2 (5%) Lung-Rad 3, 11 (29%) Lung-RADS 4A, 13 (34%) Lung-RADS 4B, and 8 (21%) Lung-RADS 4X. The size of the nodules ranged from 4 to 41 mm with a median of 13 mm. 2 (5%) were ground glass, 10 (26%) were part-solid, and 26 (68%) were solid. FDG-PET/CT was performed in 19 out of 38 cases, of which: 2 (11%) had no uptake, 10 (53%) had mild uptake, 3 (16%) had moderate uptake, and 4 (21%) had intense uptake. Risk assessment by Brock calculator revealed that 9 (24) had <5% (very low) risk; 27 (71%) had 5-65% (low-intermediate) risk, and 2 (5%) had >65% (high) risk.

conclusionSurgical resection of benign nodules is unavoidable despite application of Lung-RADS guidelines in a modern screening program, with approximately 15% of surgeries being done for benign lesions.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansLungPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedFluorodeoxyglucose F18Benign lung nodulesRate for benign surgeriesScreening low dose CT chestSurgery for benign lung nodules

Identifiers

PMID37832324
PMCPMC10783430
OpenAlexW4386759863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.