Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37831740›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Cellular migration into a subretinal honeycomb-shaped prosthesis for high-resolution prosthetic vision.

Mohajeet B Bhuckory, Bing-Yi Wang, Zhijie Charles Chen, Andrew Shin, Tiffany Huang, Ludwig Galambos, Efstathios Vounotrypidis, Keith Mathieson, Theodore Kamins, Daniel Palanker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. A flexible photoacoustic retinal prosthesis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mohajeet B Bhuckory *Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0002-2824-1899
Bing-Yi Wang *Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0001-8336-3285
Zhijie Charles ChenHansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Andrew ShinDepartment of Material Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Tiffany HuangDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0003-0486-2567
Ludwig GalambosHansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Efstathios VounotrypidisDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Keith MathiesonDepartment of Physics, University of Strathclyde, G1 1XQ Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9517-8076
Theodore KaminsDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0001-8319-1161
Daniel PalankerHansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0002-0480-3025

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
Photovoltaic Subretinal Prosthesis with High Pixel DensityR01EY027786 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PALANKER, DANIEL V · 2017 to 2021
$3.3M
Electronic photoreceptors for restoration of sight in retinal degenerationR01EY035227 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DANIEL V PALANKER · 2023 to 2026
$2.7M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027786NEI NIH HHS R01 EY035227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In patients blinded by geographic atrophy, a subretinal photovoltaic implant with 100 µm pixels provided visual acuity closely matching the pixel pitch. However, such flat bipolar pixels cannot be scaled below 75 µm, limiting the attainable visual acuity. This limitation can be overcome by shaping the electric field with 3-dimensional (3-D) electrodes. In particular, elevating the return electrode on top of the honeycomb-shaped vertical walls surrounding each pixel extends the electric field vertically and decouples its penetration into tissue from the pixel width. This approach relies on migration of the retinal cells into the honeycomb wells. Here, we demonstrate that majority of the inner retinal neurons migrate into the 25 µm deep wells, leaving the third-order neurons, such as amacrine and ganglion cells, outside. This enables selective stimulation of the second-order neurons inside the wells, thus preserving the intraretinal signal processing in prosthetic vision. Comparable glial response to that with flat implants suggests that migration and separation of the retinal cells by the walls does not cause additional stress. Furthermore, retinal migration into the honeycombs does not negatively affect its electrical excitability, while grating acuity matches the pixel pitch down to 40 μm and reaches the 27 μm limit of natural resolution in rats with 20 μm pixels. These findings pave the way for 3-D subretinal prostheses with pixel sizes of cellular dimensions.

Indexed as

PoriferaRetinal NeuronsVisual ProsthesisAnimalsElectric StimulationHumansProsthesis ImplantationRatsRetinaVision, Ocularage-related macular degenerationblindnessneuronal migrationretinal prosthesisvision restoration

Identifiers

PMID37831740
PMCPMC10589669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.