Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37831714›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Inequality of opportunity in selection procedures limits diversity in higher education: An intersectional study of Dutch selective higher education programs.

Lianne Mulder, Eddymurphy U Akwiwu, Jos W R Twisk, Andries S Koster, Jan Hindrik Ravesloot, Gerda Croiset, Rashmi A Kusurkar, Anouk Wouters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mapping the roots of specialist disparities-Authors' reply.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lianne MulderAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Research in Education, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7899-2762
Eddymurphy U AkwiwuAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jos W R TwiskAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Andries S KosterDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jan Hindrik RaveslootDepartment of Medical Biology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Gerda CroisetWenckebach Institute for Education and Training, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Rashmi A KusurkarAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Research in Education, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9382-0379
Anouk WoutersAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Research in Education, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selection for higher education (HE) programs may hinder equal opportunities for applicants and thereby reduce student diversity and representativeness. However, variables which could play a role in inequality of opportunity are often studied separately from each other. Therefore, this retrospective cohort study conducts an innovative intersectional analysis of the inequality of opportunity in admissions to selective HE programs. Using a combination of multivariable logistic regression analyses and descriptive statistics, we aimed to investigate 1) the representativeness of student populations of selective HE programs, as compared to both the applicant pool and the demographics of the age cohort; 2) the demographic background variables which are associated with an applicant's odds of admission; and 3) the intersectional acceptance rates of applicants with all, some or none of the background characteristics positively associated with odds of admission. The study focused on all selective HE programs (n = 96) in The Netherlands in 2019 and 2020, using Studielink applicant data (N = 85,839) and Statistics Netherlands microdata of ten background characteristics. The results show that student diversity in selective HE programs is limited, partly due to the widespread inequality of opportunity in the selection procedures, and partly due to self-selection. Out of all ten variables, migration background was most often (negatively) associated with the odds of receiving an offer of admission. The intersectional analyses provide detailed insight into how (dis)advantage has different effects for different groups. We therefore recommend the implementation of equitable admissions procedures which take intersectionality into account.

Indexed as

Intersectional FrameworkSchool Admission CriteriaEthnicityHumansRetrospective StudiesStudents

Identifiers

PMID37831714
PMCPMC10575509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.