ArticlePloS one2023
Mapping the human parafoveal vascular network to understand flow variability in capillaries.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Response of capillaries and small arterioles to full-field flicker is not dependent on local ganglion cell thickness.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- A High-Fidelity Computational Model for Predicting Blood Cell Trafficking and 3D Capillary Hemodynamics in Retinal Microvascular Networks.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Validation of an automated method for studying retinal capillary blood flow.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Microvascular alterations of the ocular surface and retina in connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Capillary flow is known to be non-homogenous between vessels and variable over time, for reasons that are poorly understood. The local properties of individual vessels have been shown to have limited explanatory power in this regard. This exploratory study investigates the association of network-level properties such as vessel depth, branch order, and distance from the feeding arteriole with capillary flow. Detailed network connectivity analysis was undertaken in 3 healthy young subjects using flood-illuminated adaptive optics retinal imaging, with axial depth of vessels determined via optical coherence tomography angiography. Forty-one out of 70 vessels studied were of terminal capillary type, i.e. fed from an arterial junction and drained by a venous junction. Approximately half of vessel junctions were amenable to fitting with a model of relative branch diameters, with only a few adhering to Murray's Law. A key parameter of the model (the junction exponent) was found to be inversely related to the average velocity (r = -0.59, p = 0.015) and trough velocity (r = -0.67, p = 0.004) in downstream vessels. Aspects of cellular flow, such as the minimum velocity, were also moderately correlated (r = 0.46, p = 0.009) with distance to the upstream feeding arteriole. Overall, this study shows that capillary network topology contributes significantly to the flow variability in retinal capillaries in human eyes. Understanding the heterogeneity in capillary flow is an important first step before pathological flow states can be properly understood. These results show that flow within capillary vessels is not affected by vessel depths but significantly influenced by the upstream feeder distance as well as the downstream vessel junction exponents, but there remains much to be uncovered regarding healthy capillary flow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.