Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37831596›Full record

Trial reportAnesthesiology2024

Long-term Outcomes with Spinal versus General Anesthesia for Hip Fracture Surgery: A Randomized Trial.

Emily A Vail, Rui Feng, Frederick Sieber, Jeffrey L Carson, Susan S Ellenberg, Jay Magaziner, Derek Dillane, Edward R Marcantonio, Daniel I Sessler, Sabry Ayad and 20 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review of the relative differences in adverse events used for sample size calculations in orthopaedic trauma trials.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Frailty in anesthesia.Current opinion in anaesthesiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.

Emily A VailDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Rui FengDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Frederick SieberDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jeffrey L CarsonDivision of General Internal Medicine, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Susan S EllenbergDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jay MagazinerDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Derek DillaneDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Edward R MarcantonioDepartment of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Daniel I SesslerDepartment of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Sabry AyadDepartment of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Trevor StoneDepartment of Orthopedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Steven PappDivision of Orthopedics, Ottawa Hospital Civic Campus, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Derek DoneganDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Samir MehtaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Eric S SchwenkDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-3464-4149
Mitchell MarshallDepartment of Anesthesiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.
J Douglas JaffeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Charles LukeDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Balram SharmaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts.
Syed AzimDepartment of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Robert HymesDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, Virginia.
Ki-Jinn ChinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Richard SheppardDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut.
Barry PerlmanPeacehealth Medical Group, Springfield, Oregon.
Joshua SappenfieldDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.
Ellen HauckDepartment of Anesthesiology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ann TierneyCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Annamarie D HoranDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Mark D NeumanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
REGAIN (Regional versus General Anesthesia for Promoting Independence after Hip Fracture) Investigators
University of Pennsylvania · USCleveland Clinic · USAlberta Hospital Edmonton · CABeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USHartford Hospital · USInova Fairfax Hospital · USJohns Hopkins University · USJohnson University · USLahey Medical Center · USNYU Langone Health · USOttawa Hospital · CAPeaceHealth St. John Medical Center · USStony Brook University · USTemple University · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

University of Maryland Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (UM-OAIC)P30AG028747 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Stephen L. Seliger · 2006 to 2026
$28.9M
Learning Health Systems Mentored Career Development ProgramK12HS026372 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ASCH, DAVID A, LANE-FALL, MEGHAN BROOKS · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
AHRQ HHS K12 HS026372NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effects of spinal versus general anesthesia on long-term outcomes have not been well studied. This study tested the hypothesis that spinal anesthesia is associated with better long-term survival and functional recovery than general anesthesia.

methodsA prespecified analysis was conducted of long-term outcomes of a completed randomized superiority trial that compared spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia for hip fracture repair. Participants included previously ambulatory patients 50 yr of age or older at 46 U.S. and Canadian hospitals. Patients were randomized 1:1 to spinal or general anesthesia, stratified by sex, fracture type, and study site. Outcome assessors and investigators involved in the data analysis were masked to the treatment arm. Outcomes included survival at up to 365 days after randomization (primary); recovery of ambulation among 365-day survivors; and composite endpoints for death or new inability to ambulate and death or new nursing home residence at 365 days. Patients were included in the analysis as randomized.

resultsA total of 1,600 patients were enrolled between February 12, 2016, and February 18, 2021; 795 were assigned to spinal anesthesia, and 805 were assigned to general anesthesia. Among 1,599 patients who underwent surgery, vital status information at or beyond the final study interview (conducted at approximately 365 days after randomization) was available for 1,427 (89.2%). Survival did not differ by treatment arm; at 365 days after randomization, there were 98 deaths in patients assigned to spinal anesthesia versus 92 deaths in patients assigned to general anesthesia (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.44, P = 0.59). Recovery of ambulation among patients who survived a year did not differ by type of anesthesia (adjusted odds ratio for spinal vs. general, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.14; P = 0.31). Other outcomes did not differ by treatment arm.

conclusionsLong-term outcomes were similar with spinal versus general anesthesia. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE:

Indexed as

Anesthesia, SpinalHip FracturesAgedAnesthesia, GeneralCanadaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID37831596
PMCPMC11186520
OpenAlexW4387613591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.