ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2024
Accuracy and clinical utility of heart rate variability derived from a wearable heart rate monitor in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Correlation between heart rate variability and estradiol, progesterone, and the estradiol/progesterone ratio across menstrual phases in healthy women.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- Translational Methods for Wearable Heart Rate Variability Monitoring in Older Adults: Preoperative Risk Stratification and Postoperative Monitoring.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Article
- Advancement in wrist worn physical activity trackers: technological developments and measurement accuracy: a systematic review.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Ultra-short-term stress measurement using RGB camera-based remote photoplethysmography with reduced effects of Individual differences in heart rate.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low heart rate variability (HRV) can potentially identify patients at risk of intraoperative hypotension. However, it is unclear whether cheaper, readily accessible consumer heart rate (HR) monitors can provide similar utility to clinical Holter electrocardiograph (ECG) monitors. The objectives of this study were (1) to assess the validity of using the Polar H10 HR monitor as an alternative to a clinical Holter ECG and (2) to test total power (TP) as a predictor of intraoperative hypotension. The primary outcome was the level of agreement between Polar H10 and Holter ECG. Twenty-three patients undergoing major abdominal surgery with general anesthesia had 5-minute HR recordings taken concurrently with both devices during a pre-anesthetic consultation. Agreement between Polar H10 and Holter ECG was compared via Bland-Altman analysis and Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient. Patients were divided into groups based on TP <
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.