Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37831320›Full record

ArticleCognitive processing2024

Differential effects of intrinsic properties of natural scenes and interference mechanisms on recognition processes in long-term visual memory.

Anastasiia Mikhailova, Sophie Lightfoot, José Santos-Victor, Moreno I Coco

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive processing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Visual Recognition Memory of Scenes Is Driven by Categorical, Not Sensory, Visual Representations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anastasiia MikhailovaInstitute for Systems and Robotics, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal. anastasiia.mikhailova@tecnico.ulisboa.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6113-7885
Sophie LightfootSchool of Psychology, University of East London, London, UK.
José Santos-VictorInstitute for Systems and Robotics, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9036-1728
Moreno I CocoSapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy. moreno.cocoi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2825-4200

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia PTDC/PSI-ESP/30958/2017Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia SFRH/BD/144453/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans display remarkable long-term visual memory (LTVM) processes. Even though images may be intrinsically memorable, the fidelity of their visual representations, and consequently the likelihood of successfully retrieving them, hinges on their similarity when concurrently held in LTVM. In this debate, it is still unclear whether intrinsic features of images (perceptual and semantic) may be mediated by mechanisms of interference generated at encoding, or during retrieval, and how these factors impinge on recognition processes. In the current study, participants (32) studied a stream of 120 natural scenes from 8 semantic categories, which varied in frequencies (4, 8, 16 or 32 exemplars per category) to generate different levels of category interference, in preparation for a recognition test. Then they were asked to indicate which of two images, presented side by side (i.e. two-alternative forced-choice), they remembered. The two images belonged to the same semantic category but varied in their perceptual similarity (similar or dissimilar). Participants also expressed their confidence (sure/not sure) about their recognition response, enabling us to tap into their metacognitive efficacy (meta-d'). Additionally, we extracted the activation of perceptual and semantic features in images (i.e. their informational richness) through deep neural network modelling and examined their impact on recognition processes. Corroborating previous literature, we found that category interference and perceptual similarity negatively impact recognition processes, as well as response times and metacognitive efficacy. Moreover, images semantically rich were less likely remembered, an effect that trumped a positive memorability boost coming from perceptual information. Critically, we did not observe any significant interaction between intrinsic features of images and interference generated either at encoding or during retrieval. All in all, our study calls for a more integrative understanding of the representational dynamics during encoding and recognition enabling us to form, maintain and access visual information.

Indexed as

MetacognitionRecognition, PsychologyHumansMemory, Long-TermMental RecallReaction TimeSemanticsDeep neural networkInterferenceLong-term visual memoryMetacognitionSemantic and perceptual information

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.