Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37831296›Full record

ArticleDermatology and therapy2023

The Changing Tasks of Medicine and Dermatology in the Twenty-First Century: The Need for Improved Information Capture Tools and Processes.

Howa Yeung, Yin Li, Robert A Swerlick

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Howa YeungDepartment of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Yin LiNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Robert A SwerlickDepartment of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. rswerli@emory.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9802-4144

Funding

Pfizer 36658727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The delivery of dermatology services has undergone dramatic changes in the past century. The goals and timelines of care have evolved as have the diagnostic and therapeutic tools, resulting in the need to capture and manage information differently, both qualitatively and quantitatively. The predominant and basic office-based ambulatory care model has remained relatively unchanged. Patients and providers interact with minimal pre-visit preparation using the "agenda-less" meeting model. This care model is ill-suited to manage the vastly expanded data capture and processing requirement of twenty-first century dermatology. We have developed novel tools to automate pre-visit data collection which allows for more robust information capture which moves data capture outside of the time-constrained clinic visit. These tools capture structured data, integrate into electronic health records, and create summary reports in real time to assist decision-making. These tools, if scaled, can facilitate the information management needs of dermatology care.

Indexed as

Electronic health recordsInformation sciencePatient goalsPatient-reported outcomePerformance improvementQuality of lifeQuestionnaireWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID37831296
PMCPMC10613166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.