Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37831288›Full record

ArticleChild psychiatry and human development2025

Examining the Longitudinal Relationship Between Metacognitive Beliefs and Psychological Distress in an Adolescent Population: A Preliminary Analysis.

Katie Schultz, Lee Kannis-Dymand, Daniel Jamieson, Larisa T McLoughlin, Siobhan Loughnan, Andrew Allen, Daniel F Hermens

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child psychiatry and human development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katie SchultzSchool of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, QLD, Australia.
Lee Kannis-DymandSchool of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, QLD, Australia.
Daniel JamiesonThompson Institute, University of the Sunshine Coast, Birtinya, QLD, Australia.
Larisa T McLoughlinThompson Institute, University of the Sunshine Coast, Birtinya, QLD, Australia.
Siobhan LoughnanThompson Institute, University of the Sunshine Coast, Birtinya, QLD, Australia.
Andrew AllenSchool of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, QLD, Australia. aallen2@usc.edu.au.
Daniel F HermensThompson Institute, University of the Sunshine Coast, Birtinya, QLD, Australia.
University of the Sunshine Coast · AUSunshine Coast University Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescence is a period marked by significant vulnerability to the onset of mental health concerns. Within adults, the metacognitive model of psychological disorders advocates for the involvement of metacognitive beliefs in the onset, and maintenance, of psychopathology. The current study aimed to assess the applicability of the metacognitive model in adolescence by exploring the relationship, as well as the trajectory, between metacognitive beliefs and psychological distress. The longitudinal prospective cohort study investigated data from a community-based sample of participants aged 12 to 13. Self-report assessment measures of metacognitive beliefs, psychological distress, and somatic distress are reported across four time-points. Baseline assessments are reported for 70 participants, which reduced to 53 participants at time-point four. Correlational analyses demonstrated a significant relationship between overall metacognition, as well as negative metacognitive beliefs, and psychological distress at each of the four time-points. Generalised Estimating Equations found a significant association between metacognitive predictors and psychological distress over the four time-points. These results indicate that negative metacognitive beliefs, positive metacognitive beliefs, metacognitive beliefs related to superstition, punishment, and responsibility, low perceived levels of cognitive confidence and cognitive self-consciousness predict psychological distress over 12 months in adolescents aged 12 to 13. The strongest longitudinal correlational structure was found for the model of negative metacognitive beliefs and psychological distress. These findings provide preliminary evidence for the positive linear relationship between metacognitive beliefs and psychological distress in adolescence. The study provides an important contribution to understanding the role of metacognitive beliefs in the aetiology and perpetuation of psychological distress in adolescence.

Indexed as

MetacognitionPsychological DistressStress, PsychologicalAdolescentChildFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleProspective StudiesSelf ConceptAdolescenceLongitudinalMetacognitionMetacognitive beliefsPsychological distressPsychopathology

Identifiers

PMID37831288
PMCPMC12289720
OpenAlexW4387599213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.