ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2023
Comparison of whole blood cytokine immunoassays for rapid, functional immune phenotyping in critically ill patients with sepsis.
Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intracellular ATP Levels in CD4Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Nano-Enabled Microfluidic Platforms for Functional Immunomonitoring in Pediatric Sepsis.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- The incremental value of a novel immuno-inflammatory index (SIICI) in predicting sepsis after ureteroscopic lithotripsy: development and validation of a nomogram.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- IFNγ in human sepsis: a scoping review.Annals of intensive care · 2025Review
- Determining potential immunomodulatory drug efficacy in sepsis using ELISpot.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- FUNCTIONAL IMMUNOPHENOTYPING FOR PRECISION THERAPIES IN SEPSIS.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2025Review
- Functional immune profiling of hyper- and hypo-inflammatory subphenotypes of critical illness: a secondary analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Time-Dependent Variation in Immunoparalysis Biomarkers Among Patients with Sepsis and Critical Illness.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Predicting Organ Dysfunction in Septic and Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study Using Rapid Ex Vivo Immune Profiling.Critical care explorations · 2024Observational
- Adverse outcomes and an immunosuppressed endotype in septic patients with reduced IFN-γ ELISpot.JCI insight · 2024Article
- Time-dependent variation in immunoparalysis biomarkers among patients with sepsis and critical illness.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSepsis is characterized by highly heterogeneous immune responses associated with a spectrum of disease severity. Methods that rapidly and sensitively profile these immune responses can potentially personalize immune-adjuvant therapies for sepsis. We hypothesized that the ELLA microfluidic approach to measure cytokine production from the whole blood of septic and critically ill patients would deliver faster, more precise results than the existing optic-driven ELISpot quantification. We tested our hypothesis by measuring ex vivo-stimulated production of TNF and IFNγ in critically ill and septic patients (n = 22), critically ill and non-septic patients (n = 10), and healthy volunteers (n = 10) through both ELLA and ELISpot immunoassays. Blood samples were subjected to one of three stimulants for 4 h or 18 h durations during days 1, 7-10, and 14 of critical illness. Stimulants for lymphocytes included anti-CD3/anti-CD28 and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), whereas LPS was used for monocytes. Stimulated TNF and IFNγ concentrations were then associated with 30-day mortality.
resultsBoth ELISpot and ELLA immunoassays showed substantial agreement in TNF concentrations post 4 h and 18 h LPS stimulation, with concordance correlation coefficients at 0.62 and 0.60, respectively. ELLA had a broad dynamic measurement range and provided accurate TNF and IFNγ readings at both minimal and elevated cytokine concentrations (with mean coefficients of variation between triplicate readings at 2.1 ± 1.4% and 4.9 ± 7.2%, respectively). However, there was no association between the ELLA-determined cytokine concentrations on the first day of critical illness and 30-day mortality rate. In contrast, using the ELISpot for cytokine quantification revealed that non-survivors had reduced baseline TNF levels at 18 h, decreased LPS-induced TNF levels at 18 h, and diminished TNF levels post 4 h/18 h anti-CD3/28 stimulation.
conclusionsOur study affirms the feasibility of obtaining dependable immune phenotyping data within 6 h of blood collection from critically ill patients, both septic and non-septic, using the ELLA immunoassay. Both ELLA and ELISpot can offer valuable insights into prognosis, therapeutic strategies, and the underlying mechanisms of sepsis development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.