ReviewLangenbeck's archives of surgery2023
Combined application of inflammation-related biomarkers to predict postoperative complications of rectal cancer patients: a retrospective study by machine learning analysis.
Review in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI Trustworthiness in the Perioperative Period for Patients with Serious Illness: Scoping Narrative Review.JMIR perioperative medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning model for predicting a high comprehensive complication index following rectal cancer surgery.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Machine learning for postoperative complication prediction and early recurrence risk assessment across cancer types: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative complications in patients of rectal cancer pose challenges to postoperative recovery. Accurately predicting these complications is crucial for developing effective treatment plans for patients.
methodsIn this retrospective study, 493 patients with rectal cancer who underwent radical resection between January 2020 and December 2021 were examined. We evaluated logistic regression, support vector machines, regression trees, and random forests to predict the incidence of postoperative complications in patients and evaluate the performance of the model. The results will be analyzed to make recommendations for reducing complications.
resultsAmong the four machine learning models, random forest demonstrated the highest results. The performance of this model was showed with an AUC of 0.880 (95% CI 0.807-0.949), an accuracy of 88.0% (95% CI 0.815-0.929), a sensitivity of 96.6%, and a specificity of 45.8%. Notably, factors such as inflammation related prognostic index, prognostic nutritional index, tumor location, and T stage were found to significantly increase the probability of postoperative complications.
conclusionOur study provided evidence that machine learning models can effectively evaluate early postoperative complications of the patients after surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.