Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37831193›Full record

ReviewClinical oral investigations2023

The recent ethics boom in dentistry-moral fig leaf, fleeting trend or professional awakening?

Dominik Groß, Saskia Wilhelmy

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical oral investigations, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dominik GroßUniversity Hospital, Institute for the History, Theory and Ethics in Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Wendlingweg 2, D-52074, Aachen, Germany. dgross@ukaachen.de.
Saskia WilhelmyUniversity Hospital, Institute for the History, Theory and Ethics in Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Wendlingweg 2, D-52074, Aachen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives"Ethics in dentistry" seems to be gaining importance as more and more dental institutions, professional associations and dental schools are addressing ethical issues. The aim of this paper is to highlight this ongoing development and to analyze and evaluate its relevance for future dentistry and the dental profession. MATERIALS AND

methodsA qualitative analysis of literature and Internet sources served as the methodological basis. Recent trends were first illustrated using striking examples and then compared with the status quo in medicine and the medical profession, where ethics have a long professional tradition. It is discussed to what extent it seems worthwhile to transfer existing structures and initiatives in medicine to dentistry.

resultsThere is a broad variety of ethical announcements and initiatives in international dentistry (e.g., dental codes of ethics, adjustments to dental licensure regulations, professional publications, textbooks, awards, podcasts). It should be noted that ethical issues arise not only in life-threatening situations, but also in everyday dental practice. Existing ethical structures in medicine can be adapted or provide guidance for education, clinical practice and research.

conclusionsTeaching ethical competence in dental education, clinical practice and research can make an important contribution to the professionalization of dentists-quite similar to medicine. Furthermore, a broad integration of ethics in dentistry strengthens the public image of dentists. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Dealing confidently with ethical issues is a key competence for successful work as a dentist-both in practice and in science.

Indexed as

FicusDentistryHumansMoralsBioethicsDental careDental ethicsDental trendsProfessional ethics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.