Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37831127›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neurology2024

High intake of ultra-processed food is associated with dementia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Alex E Henney, Conor S Gillespie, Uazman Alam, Theresa J Hydes, Clare E Mackay, Daniel J Cuthbertson

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Toward AI-Assisted Methodological Evaluations of Health Risk Analyses Using Diverse Types of Evidence.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  8. [Dementia with Lewy bodies].Fortschritte der Neurologie-Psychiatrie · 2026
    Review
  9. [Modifiable risk and protective factors for dementia: an overview of established and emerging evidence].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. We Need a Full Tank of High-Test Resilience.Oncology nursing forum · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alex E HenneyDepartment of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. alexander.henney@aintree.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8066-9470
Conor S GillespieDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Uazman AlamDepartment of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Theresa J HydesDepartment of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Clare E MackayDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Daniel J CuthbertsonDepartment of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsPoor cardiometabolic health is associated with dementia. Considering previous meta-analyses have confirmed associations between ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and cardiometabolic disease, we were interested in the contribution of UPF consumption to the risk of developing dementia.

methodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all records registered on Ovid Medline and Web of Science from inception until December 2022 [PROSPERO (CRD42023388363)]. Studies that assessed UPF consumption in adults, determined according to NOVA, and that reported dementia (Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia and mild cognitive impairment) determined by clearly stated diagnostic criteria (including formal assessment of dementia or use of diagnostic codes) were included. The association between UPF consumption and dementia was assessed using random-effects meta-analysis, controlling for confounding variables. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale and evidence credibility evaluated using the NutriGrade system.

resultsSeven thousand ten records were screened, and 122 records underwent full text review. From these, 10 observational (8 longitudinal) studies, analysing 867,316 individuals, were included. Included studies adjusted for age, socioeconomic status and co-morbidity, alongside other confounders. High (vs. low) intake of UPF was associated with increased risk of dementia (pooled relative risk 1.44 (95% confidence interval 1.09-1.90) (p = 0.02)) (I

conclusionHigh UPF consumption is associated with dementia. Public health measures to reduce overconsumption of UPFs are imperative to reduce the burden of dementia.

Indexed as

DementiaFood, ProcessedAdultDietHumansObservational Studies as TopicPublic HealthAlzheimer’s dementiaDementiaMetabolic syndromeMild cognitive impairmentNOVAUltra-processed food

Identifiers

PMID37831127
PMCPMC10770002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.