Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37830737›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Performance Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Sarcopenia Diagnosis in Older Adults.

Su Ozgur, Yasemin Atik Altinok, Devrim Bozkurt, Zeliha Fulden Saraç, Selahattin Fehmi Akçiçek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Su OzgurDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, 35040 Izmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-8993-674X
Yasemin Atik AltinokDepartment of Pediatric Endocrinology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, 35040 Izmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-5851-1012
Devrim BozkurtDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, 35040 Izmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-4557-3390
Zeliha Fulden SaraçDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, 35040 Izmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-9281-2492
Selahattin Fehmi AkçiçekDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, 35040 Izmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-2583-4709
Ege University · TR

Funding

Ege University 05.06.2018 /18-TIP-023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSarcopenia is a progressive and generalized skeletal muscle disorder. Early diagnosis is necessary to reduce the adverse effects and consequences of sarcopenia, which can help prevent and manage it in a timely manner. The aim of this study was to identify the important risk factors for sarcopenia diagnosis and compare the performance of machine learning (ML) algorithms in the early detection of potential sarcopenia.

methodsA cross-sectional design was employed for this study, involving 160 participants aged 65 years and over who resided in a community. ML algorithms were applied by selecting 11 features-sex, age, BMI, presence of hypertension, presence of diabetes mellitus, SARC-F score, MNA score, calf circumference (CC), gait speed, handgrip strength (HS), and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC)-from a pool of 107 clinical variables. The results of the three best-performing algorithms were presented.

resultsThe highest accuracy values were achieved by the ALL (male + female) model using LightGBM (0.931), random forest (RF; 0.927), and XGBoost (0.922) algorithms. In the female model, the support vector machine (SVM; 0.939), RF (0.923), and k-nearest neighbors (KNN; 0.917) algorithms performed the best. Regarding variable importance in the ALL model, the last HS, sex, BMI, and MUAC variables had the highest values. In the female model, these variables were HS, age, MUAC, and BMI, respectively.

conclusionsMachine learning algorithms have the ability to extract valuable insights from data structures, enabling accurate predictions for the early detection of sarcopenia. These predictions can assist clinicians in the context of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine (PPPM).

Indexed as

early diagnosismachine learningolder adultspredictive preventive personalized medicine (3P/PPPM)sarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID37830737
PMCPMC10572141
OpenAlexW4387450874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.