Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37830417›Full record

ArticleAnnals of dermatology2023

A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Dose-Comparison Pilot Study to Comparatively Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Two Doses of Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection for Deltoid Muscle Hypertrophy.

Young Gue Koh, Sun Hye Shin, Ka Ram Kim, Seung Hoon Yeoum, Won-Woo Choi, Kui Young Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Young Gue KohDepartment of Dermatology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6376-0328
Sun Hye ShinDepartment of Dermatology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0479-8174
Ka Ram KimDepartment of Dermatology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4308-8589
Seung Hoon YeoumSongpajeil Orthopedic Clinic, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3423-1750
Won-Woo ChoiWellsclinic, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4745-091X
Kui Young ParkDepartment of Dermatology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. kyky@cauhs.or.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5965-1754

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBotulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) injection is being widely used off-label for muscular hypertrophy, including deltoid muscle hypertrophy. However, very few studies have evaluated the optimal dosage and its clinical response.

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of different doses of Prabotulinum toxin A (PBoNT) for treating deltoid muscle hypertrophy.

methodsTwelve particiapants with bilateral deltoid muscle hypertrophy were enrolled and randomly received either 16 U or 32 U of PBoNT. In each participant, the same dose was administered to both deltoid muscles. Both participants and evaluators were blinded. Deltoid muscle thickness and upper arm circumference were measured on day 0, and weeks 2, 4, and 12 after the PBoNT injection.

resultsUpper arm circumference significantly decreased in both groups; however, deltoid muscle thickness was reduced in the 16 U group only. No major complications were reported in both groups. However, a few minor complications were reported in the 16 U injection group.

conclusionBoth 16 U and 32 U of PBoNT intramuscular injections are safe and effective in treating deltoid hypertrophy.

Indexed as

Botulinum toxinsDeltoid muscleHypertrophy

Identifiers

PMID37830417
PMCPMC10579568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.