ArticleAnnals of dermatology2023
Association between Family History and Male Androgenetic Alopecia with Female Pattern Hair Loss.
Article in Annals of dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hairline as a Neurosurgical Landmark.Cureus · 2026Article
- Research Trends and Hotspots in Female Pattern Hair Loss: A Bibliometric Study.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Article
- Investigating the Relationship Between Androgenetic Alopecia and Hair Shape, Color, and Thickness: A Case-Control Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Assessment of androgenic hormones and other risk factors in Egyptian males with early onset androgenetic alopecia: a case control study.Archives of dermatological research · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMale androgenetic alopecia (MAGA) is often accompanied by female pattern hair loss (FPHL). However, the risk factors related to MAGA with FPHL are unclear.
objectiveTo investigate demographic and laboratory factors related to MAGA with FPHL.
methodsThis retrospective case-control study was performed in a single tertiary care center for MAGA with FPHL between March 2012 and September 2021. Eligible patients were males >12 years old diagnosed with androgenetic alopecia by a dermatologist. The patients were subdivided into MAGA with FPHL and MAGA without FPHL groups. Comorbidities as well as demographic, laboratory, and disease-specific variables were compared between the two groups. Data analysis was conducted between October 2021 and February 2022. The independent samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and chi-squared test were used to assess the factors that contributed to MAGA with FPHL.
resultsOf 469 patients with MAGA, 309 (65.9%) had FPHL, which was a much higher rate than previously reported. Among the variables, only matrilineal (odds ratio, 1.605; 95% confidence interval, 1.014~2.541) and maternal history (odds ratio, 4.705; confidence interval, 1.632~13.559) of androgenetic alopecia were significantly associated with MAGA with FPHL. In the MAGA with FPHL group, a significant positive correlation was noted between body mass index and the type F score (r=0.114,
conclusionIn this case-control study, patients with MAGA and a maternal history of androgenetic alopecia were at risk of FPHL. Therefore, early screening may benefit these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.