ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2023
Deep Learning Algorithms to Detect Murmurs Associated With Structural Heart Disease.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chest auscultation - tradition and expectationsScandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Review
- Emerging Artificial Intelligence Tools for the Screening of Structural and Valvular Heart Disease.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
- Deep learning-driven automated detection of canine cardiac murmurs via digital wireless stethoscope auscultation.Veterinary research communications · 2026Article
- Electronic Stethoscope Auscultation and Echocardiography in ARDS: Correlation and Prognostic Value for Mortality and ICU Length of Stay: A Prospective Observational Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Artificial-intelligence-enabled digital stethoscope improves point-of-care screening for moderate-to-severe valvular heart disease.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Sports Cardiology: Advancing Cardiovascular Screening and Diagnosis.Cureus · 2026Review
- Feasibility of detecting aortic stenosis with mobile phone auscultation data: a pilot study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Development and validation of AI-Enhanced auscultation for valvular heart disease screening through a multi-centre study.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2026Article
- Article
- Automated Detection of Reduced Ejection Fraction Using an ECG-Enabled Digital Stethoscope: A Large Cohort Validation.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
- Development and Evaluation of a Deep Learning-Based Pulmonary Hypertension Screening Algorithm Using a Digital Stethoscope.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Rwanda RHD Research Network: Central Hub for International Collaborative Efforts to Tackle Rheumatic Heart Disease.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- Automated analysis of heart sound signals in screening for structural heart disease in children.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- The unreliability of crackles: insights from a breath sound study using physicians and artificial intelligence.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2024Article
- Foundation models for cardiovascular disease detection via biosignals from digital stethoscopes.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2024Article
- Deep Learning in Heart Sound Analysis: From Techniques to Clinical Applications.Health data science · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background The success of cardiac auscultation varies widely among medical professionals, which can lead to missed treatments for structural heart disease. Applying machine learning to cardiac auscultation could address this problem, but despite recent interest, few algorithms have been brought to clinical practice. We evaluated a novel suite of Food and Drug Administration-cleared algorithms trained via deep learning on >15 000 heart sound recordings. Methods and Results We validated the algorithms on a data set of 2375 recordings from 615 unique subjects. This data set was collected in real clinical environments using commercially available digital stethoscopes, annotated by board-certified cardiologists, and paired with echocardiograms as the gold standard. To model the algorithm in clinical practice, we compared its performance against 10 clinicians on a subset of the validation database. Our algorithm reliably detected structural murmurs with a sensitivity of 85.6% and specificity of 84.4%. When limiting the analysis to clearly audible murmurs in adults, performance improved to a sensitivity of 97.9% and specificity of 90.6%. The algorithm also reported timing within the cardiac cycle, differentiating between systolic and diastolic murmurs. Despite optimizing acoustics for the clinicians, the algorithm substantially outperformed the clinicians (average clinician accuracy, 77.9%; algorithm accuracy, 84.7%.) Conclusions The algorithms accurately identified murmurs associated with structural heart disease. Our results illustrate a marked contrast between the consistency of the algorithm and the substantial interobserver variability of clinicians. Our results suggest that adopting machine learning algorithms into clinical practice could improve the detection of structural heart disease to facilitate patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.