Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37830274›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthodontics2024

Clear aligner therapy practice among orthodontists in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland: A cross-sectional survey of the British Orthodontic Society membership.

Maurice J Meade, Tony Weir, Jadbinder Seehra, Padhraig S Fleming

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthodontics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Patient experiences with clear aligners: a scoping review.European journal of orthodontics · 2025
    Article
  13. Euler-angle norms for tooth rotation, torque and tip.Orthodontics & craniofacial research · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maurice J MeadeOrthodontic Unit, Adelaide Dental School, Adelaide Health and Medical Sciences Building, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5688-1079
Tony WeirOrthodontic Unit, Adelaide Dental School, Adelaide Health and Medical Sciences Building, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Jadbinder SeehraCentre for Craniofacial Development & Regeneration, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3243-1580
Padhraig S FlemingDivision of Public and Child Dental Health, Dublin Dental University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate clear aligner therapy (CAT) practice among orthodontists in the British Orthodontic Society (BOS).

designA cross-sectional online survey.

methodsAn electronic survey was distributed to members of the BOS in 2022. The survey comprised questions regarding respondent demographics, general use of CAT, the choice of proprietary CAT appliances, CAT planning, case selection, treatment protocols and orthodontist-reported CAT problems.

resultsOverall, there were 233 (19.5%) respondants with the majority (n = 121, 53.1%) being female. Most respondents reported practising in England (n = 171, 74.7%). The majority (n = 177, 77.3%) indicated that they used CAT in their practice, with 48.1% (n = 81) treating 1-20 patients with CAT annually. The most frequently prescribed CAT system was Invisalign (n = 138, 81.2%). One to three changes to the initial digital treatment plan were made by 72.9% (n = 121) with final tooth positions being the most common reason for adjustment (64.4%). Most (n = 97, 60.3%) rarely or never performed premolar extractions with CAT. Of the respondents, 23 12.7%) reported that they always or mostly used a remote monitoring system in conjunction with CAT, with a wide range of aligner change protocols reported. The median number of months required to complete non-extraction CAT reported by the respondents was 12. Most respondents (n = 77, 51.7%) did not feel that CAT provides superior outcomes compared with fixed appliance therapy.

conclusionCAT practice varied widely among the surveyed orthodontists. A predilection for the use of Invisalign and utility in less severe cases was noted.

Indexed as

OrthodontistsPractice Patterns, Dentists'Societies, DentalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIrelandMaleMalocclusionMiddle AgedOrthodontic Appliance DesignOrthodonticsOrthodontics, CorrectiveSurveys and QuestionnairesTooth Movement Techniquesclear aligner therapyInvisalignorthodontic practicesurvey

Identifiers

PMID37830274
PMCPMC11141077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.