Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37830105›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2023

Clinical trial simulation to evaluate tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis dosing during pregnancy.

Rachel K Scott, Yifan Yu, Mark A Marzinke, Jenell S Coleman, Craig W Hendrix, Robert Bies

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachel K Scott *Women's Health Research, MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, DC, United States.
Yifan Yu *Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States.
Mark A MarzinkeDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Jenell S ColemanDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Craig W HendrixDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Robert BiesDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States.

Funding

Vaccine Response and Immunotherapeutics SWGP30AI094189 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Richard E. Chaisson · 2012 to 2026
$67.0M
Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Clinical Trial Simulation to optimize HIV Prevention in Pregnancy and PostpartumR21HD106582 · NICHD · MEDSTAR HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI SCOTT, RACHEL K · 2021 to 2022
$459k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI094189NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD106582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate upward-adjustment of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)/emtricitabine (FTC) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) dosing during pregnancy in order to maintain target plasma concentrations associated with HIV protection. Design: Population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling and clinical trial simulation (CTS). Material and methods: We developed population pharmacokinetic models for TFV and FTC using data from the Partners Demonstration Project and a PK study of TDF/FTC among cisgender women by Coleman et al., and performed an in-silico simulation. Pregnancy-trimester was identified as a significant covariate on apparent clearance in the optimized final model. We simulated 1,000 pregnant individuals starting standard daily oral TDF/FTC (300 mg/200 mg) prior to pregnancy. Upon becoming pregnant, simulated patients were split into two study arms: one continuing standard-dose and the other receiving double standard-dose throughout pregnancy. Results: Standard-dose trough TFV concentrations were significantly lower in pregnancy compared to pre-pregnancy, with 34.0%, 43.8%, and 65.1% of trough plasma concentrations below the lower bound of expected trough concentrations presumed to be the protective threshold in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd trimesters, respectively. By comparison, in the simulated double-dose group, 10.7%, 14.4%, and 27.8% of trough concentrations fell below the estimated protective thresholds in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd trimesters, respectively. The FTC trough plasma concentration during pregnancy was also lower than pre-pregnancy, with 45.2% of the steady-state trough concentrations below the estimated protective trough concentrations of FTC. In the pregnancy-adjusted double-dose group, 24.1% of trough plasma concentrations were lower than protective levels. Conclusions: Our simulation shows >50% of research participants on standard dosing would have 3rd trimester trough plasma TFV concentrations below levels associated with protection. This simulation provides the quantitative basis for the design of prospective TDF/FTC studies during pregnancy to evaluate the safety and appropriateness of pregnancy-adjusted dosing.

Indexed as

clinical trial simulationemtricitabineHIV infectionpopulation pharmacokinetic modelingpre-exposure prophylaxispregnancytenofovir

Identifiers

PMID37830105
PMCPMC10565828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.