ArticlePathogens & immunity2023
Genomic Characterization of 2
Article in Pathogens & immunity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: We used standard microbiological methods for phenotypic characterization and performed whole genome sequencing on 2 Results: Antibiotic susceptibility testing showed beta-lactamase negative and low minimal inhibitory concentrations to all antibiotics tested, with the exception of metronidazole. We assembled complete genomes of the 2 isolates, which are approximately 2.5 megabases in length. The isolates belong to the single-locus sequence type (SLST) H1 and the multi-locus sequence type (MLST) IB. Both isolates have similar composition of known virulence genes, and we found no evidence of plasmids but did find phage-associated genes. Notably, the 2 genomes are 99.97% identical but contain a large genomic inversion encompassing approximately half of the genome. Conclusions: This is the first characterization of this large-scale genomic inversion in nearly identical isolates from the same wound. This report adds to the limited numbers of publicly available infection-associated complete genomes of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.