Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37830032›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2023

Reducing bias in secondary data analysis via an Explore and Confirm Analysis Workflow (ECAW): a proposal and survey of observational researchers.

Robert T Thibault, Marton Kovacs, Tom E Hardwicke, Alexandra Sarafoglou, John P A Ioannidis, Marcus R Munafò

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Robert T ThibaultMeta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-6104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6561-3962
Marton KovacsDoctoral School of Psychology, ELTE Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-8142-8492
Tom E HardwickeMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9485-4952
Alexandra SarafoglouDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0031-685X
John P A IoannidisMeta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-6104, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3118-6859
Marcus R MunafòSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4049-993X

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00032/7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

ALSPACblind data analysisExplore and Confirm Analysis Workflow (ECAW)meta-researchopen sciencepreregistration

Identifiers

PMID37830032
PMCPMC10565389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.