ArticleMethodsX2023
A method for simulating forward falls and controlling impact velocity.
Article in MethodsX, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Assessment of protective arm reactions associated with forward falls are typically performed by dropping research participants from a height onto a landing surface. The impact velocity is generally modulated by controlling the total height of the fall. This contrasts with an actual fall where the fall velocity is dependent on several factors in addition to fall height and not likely predictable at the onset of the fall. A counterweight and pulley system can be used to modulate the fall velocity in simulated forward falls in a manner that is not predictable to study participants, enhancing experimental validity. However, predicting the fall velocity based on participant height and weight and counterweight mass is not straightforward. In this article, the design of the FALL simulator For Injury prevention Training and assessment (FALL FIT) system is described. A dynamic model of the FALL FIT and counterweight system is developed and model parameters are fit using nonlinear optimization and experimental data. The fitted model enables prediction of fall velocity as a function of participant height and weight and counterweight load. The method can be used to provide controllable perturbations thereby elucidating the control strategy used when protecting the body from injury in a forward fall, how the control strategy changes because of aging or dysfunction or as a method for progressive protective arm reaction training.•Construction of device to simulate forward falls with controllable impact velocity using material that are commercially available is described•A dynamic model of the FALL FIT is developed to estimate the impact velocity of a simulated forward fall using participant height and counterweight load•The dynamic model is validated using data from 3 previous studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.