Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37829775›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2023

Comparative assessment of dexmedetomidine and butorphanol for attenuation of etomidate-induced myoclonus: A double-blind, randomised controlled study.

Rajesh S Rautela, Michell Gulabani, Pramod Kumar, Rashmi Salhotra, Medha Mohta, Kshitiz Verma

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rajesh S RautelaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, Delhi, India.
Michell GulabaniDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, Delhi, India.
Pramod KumarDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, Delhi, India.
Rashmi SalhotraDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, Delhi, India.
Medha MohtaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, Delhi, India.
Kshitiz VermaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, Delhi, India.
University College of Medical Sciences · INGuru Teg Bahadur Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Etomidate is a popular induction agent, but its use is associated with myoclonus in 50%-80% of non-premedicated patients. This study aims to compare dexmedetomidine and butorphanol for their relative efficacy in preventing etomidate-induced myoclonus. Methods: This randomised study was conducted after obtaining institutional ethical committee clearance and written informed consent from sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I or II consenting patients between 18 and 60 years of age of either sex who had been scheduled for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated to dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg (Group D) or butorphanol 0.015 mg/kg (Group B). Both the drugs were given as an infusion over a period of 10 min before induction of anaesthesia. The primary outcome was the incidence of myoclonic movements after etomidate, and the secondary outcomes were the severity of myoclonus, changes in the haemodynamic parameters and incidence of airway complications. Normally distributed variables were compared using Student's Results: The incidence of etomidate-induced myoclonus was significantly higher in group B compared to group D ( Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine was more effective than butorphanol in preventing etomidate-induced myoclonus.

Indexed as

Anaesthesiabutorphanoldexmedetomidineetomidatemyoclonus

Identifiers

PMID37829775
PMCPMC10566664
OpenAlexW4386452894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.