ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2023
Quantitative assessment of ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block - A comparison of a single-point versus two-point injection technique: A randomised controlled, double-blinded trial.
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Infographics of published articles.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Noninferiority of 0.25% versus 0.375% Ropivacaine in Popliteal Sciatic and Saphenous Nerve Blocks for Analgesia After Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Randomized Self-Paired Noninferiority Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Sciatic nerve block at the popliteal level for lower limb procedures provides unpredictable success rates even with ultrasonographic (USG) guidance. This study aimed to compare USG-guided single-point versus two-point injection techniques Methods: Sixty patients posted for foot surgeries under USG-guided sciatic nerve block were randomised into Group Single Point, receiving a single injection of 20 mL of 1.5% lignocaine with adrenaline just proximal to the sciatic nerve bifurcation, and Group Double Point, receiving two injections of 10 mL of 1.5% lignocaine with adrenaline, one at the point similar to the first group and a second injection 6 cm above the first point. Sensory blockade onset, time to complete sensory blockade, time to complete motor blockade, length of the nerve exposed and analgesia duration were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) statistics version 20 software. Results: Double-point injection technique showed a significantly faster time to complete motor blockade [14.46 (9.93) min], increased length of nerve exposed to local anaesthetic [23.23 (7.209) cm] and extended duration of analgesia [420.40 (99.34) min] compared to the single-point injection technique [20.89 (12.62) min, 18.78 (5.95) cm and 344.28 (125.97) min, respectively]. The onset of sensory blockade and the time to complete sensory blockade were comparable between the two groups. Conclusion: USG-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block with a double-point injection technique does not significantly shorten the time to complete the sensory block. However, the time to complete motor nerve block and duration of analgesia are prolonged significantly, which may be clinically beneficial for postoperative analgesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.