Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37829618›Full record

ArticleComputational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2023

Exploring genetic influences on adverse outcome pathways using heuristic simulation and graph data science.

Joseph D Romano, Liang Mei, Jonathan Senn, Jason H Moore, Holly M Mortensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joseph D RomanoInstitute for Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Liang MeiOak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, TN, United States.
Jonathan SennOak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, TN, United States.
Jason H MooreDepartment of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Holly M MortensenUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES013508 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Trevor M Penning · 2006 to 2026
$35.3M
Bioinformatics Strategies for Genome-Wide Association StudiesR01LM010098 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MOORE, JASON H., WILLIAMS, SCOTT MATTHEW · 2009 to 2023
$5.1M
Artificial Intelligence Strategies for Alzheimer's Disease ResearchR01AG066833 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MOORE, JASON H., RITCHIE, MARYLYN D · 2021 to 2021
$1.6M
Informatics Algorithms for Genomic Analysis of Brain Imaging DataR01LM013463 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MOORE, JASON H., SAYKIN, ANDREW J · 2020 to 2023
$1.4M
Discovering clinical endpoints of toxicity via graph machine learning and semantic data analysisR00LM013646 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ROMANO, JOSEPH DANIEL · 2023 to 2025
$646k
Discovering clinical endpoints of toxicity via graph machine learning and semantic data analysisK99LM013646 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ROMANO, JOSEPH DANIEL · 2021 to 2022
$183k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG066833NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES013508NLM NIH HHS K99 LM013646NLM NIH HHS R00 LM013646NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010098NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013463
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adverse outcome pathways provide a powerful tool for understanding the biological signaling cascades that lead to disease outcomes following toxicity. The framework outlines downstream responses known as key events, culminating in a clinically significant adverse outcome as a final result of the toxic exposure. Here we use the AOP framework combined with artificial intelligence methods to gain novel insights into genetic mechanisms that underlie toxicity-mediated adverse health outcomes. Specifically, we focus on liver cancer as a case study with diverse underlying mechanisms that are clinically significant. Our approach uses two complementary AI techniques: Generative modeling via automated machine learning and genetic algorithms, and graph machine learning. We used data from the US Environmental Protection Agency's Adverse Outcome Pathway Database (AOP-DB; aopdb.epa.gov) and the UK Biobank's genetic data repository. We use the AOP-DB to extract disease-specific AOPs and build graph neural networks used in our final analyses. We use the UK Biobank to retrieve real-world genotype and phenotype data, where genotypes are based on single nucleotide polymorphism data extracted from the AOP-DB, and phenotypes are case/control cohorts for the disease of interest (liver cancer) corresponding to those adverse outcome pathways. We also use propensity score matching to appropriately sample based on important covariates (demographics, comorbidities, and social deprivation indices) and to balance the case and control populations in our machine language training/testing datasets. Finally, we describe a novel putative risk factor for LC that depends on genetic variation in both the aryl-hydrocarbon receptor (

Indexed as

Adverse outcome pathwaygenetic programmingGraph data scienceLiver cancer

Identifiers

PMID37829618
PMCPMC10569310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.