Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37829615›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

SeqVerify: An accessible analysis tool for cell line genomic integrity, contamination, and gene editing outcomes.

Merrick Pierson Smela, Valerio Pepe, George M Church

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Merrick Pierson SmelaWyss Institute at Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5816-7098
Valerio PepeWyss Institute at Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
George M ChurchWyss Institute at Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6232-9969
Harvard University Press · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Human iPSC-derived ovarian follicles as a model of female reproductionF31HD108898 · NICHD · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI PIERSON SMELA, MERRICK DE FOREST · 2022 to 2024
$98k
NICHD NIH HHS F31 HD108898
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1Over the last decade, advances in genome editing and pluripotent stem cell (PSC) culture have let researchers generate edited PSC lines to study a wide variety of biological questions. However, abnormalities in cell lines such as aneuploidy, on-target and off-target editing errors, and microbial contamination can arise during PSC culture or due to undesired editing outcomes. Any of these abnormalities can invalidate experiments, so detecting them is crucial. The ongoing decline of next-generation sequencing prices has made whole genome sequencing (WGS) an effective quality control option, since WGS can detect any abnormality involving changes to DNA sequences or presence of unwanted sequences. However, this approach has suffered from a lack of easily usable data analysis software. Here, we present SeqVerify, a computational pipeline designed to take raw WGS data and a list of intended edits, and verify that the edits are present and that there are no abnormalities. We anticipate that SeqVerify will be a useful tool for researchers generating edited PSCs, and more broadly, for cell line quality control in general.

Indexed as

aneuploidygenome editingmicrobial contaminationPluripotent stem cellquality controlSeqVerifysingle nucleotide polymorphismssoftwareStem cellWhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID37829615
PMCPMC10565884
OpenAlexW4387141334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.